2006
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925x-5-31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram

Abstract: Background: The QT interval and the QT dispersion are currently a subject of considerable interest. Cardiac repolarization delay is known to favor the development of arrhythmias. The QT dispersion, defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals or as the standard deviation of the QT duration in the 12-lead ECG is assumed to be reliable predictor of cardiovascular mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TEMEO electronic center consists of a server with developed software for automatic R-R interval analysis [ 17 , 18 ]—for rhythm detection (including atrial fibrillation), heart rate, and premature beats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TEMEO electronic center consists of a server with developed software for automatic R-R interval analysis [ 17 , 18 ]—for rhythm detection (including atrial fibrillation), heart rate, and premature beats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptionally, there is also a small number of shorter recordings, however, none of the records last less than 30 seconds. Diagnostic classification of recordings includes healthy and various disease categories such as MI, cardiomyopathy/heart failure, branch block, rhythm disturbance, myocardial and hypertrophy (Chen et al 2013;Christov et al 2006;M. Vozda, T. Peterek 2014).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of QT annotation where baseline wander is frequent, it was observed that a few annotators consistently over-or under-estimated the QT interval [25]. Other studies have reported significant intra-and inter-observer variability in QT annotations, ranging from 10 to 30ms [3,8].…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%