2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Database of movement control in the cervical spine. Reference normal of 182 asymptomatic persons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with a study indicating perfect and high reliability for both time and number of errors to trace both patterns (Werner et al, 2018). The current study corroborates these findings using age-and gender-matched neck pain and control groups, given both variables are known to affect CMS (Kristjansson et al, 2016, Oddsdottir et al , 2013, Sarig Bahat H, 2016.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in agreement with a study indicating perfect and high reliability for both time and number of errors to trace both patterns (Werner et al, 2018). The current study corroborates these findings using age-and gender-matched neck pain and control groups, given both variables are known to affect CMS (Kristjansson et al, 2016, Oddsdottir et al , 2013, Sarig Bahat H, 2016.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the HC group we found that females had a consistently larger deviation in the Fly tests compared to men in the HC group suggesting that the group differences in Kristjansson et al [ 12 ] may be influenced by the different gender distribution in the groups. However, Oddsdottir et al found similar results between healthy females and men for the same Fly tests [ 29 ]. This discrepancy between the studies requires further investigation before this test can be implemented in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Multiple robust regression with Huber's method was used for the other variables due to heteroskedasticity [27]. We adjusted for age and gender (model 1) in all analyses because age has been shown to influence several of the variables measured [28][29][30] and gender was not equally distributed between the groups (Table 1). In the analyses of CM we also adjusted for maximum ROM in the primary plane (model 2) and in the final model for both maximum ROM and peak velocity in the primary plane ROM test (model 3), since these covariates are shown to influence smoothness of movement in previous studies [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%