The 57th IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Spring.
DOI: 10.1109/vetecs.2003.1208882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Database correlation method for UMTS location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figures 5, 6, and 7, TAE was calculated by averaging the best 10% weighted location candidates, that is, k = 0.1 * n in (15). The explanation in the previous paragraph can be confirmed if we look at the results obtained when k is increased up to 0.9 * n. Figure 11: Mean positioning error of the location estimation algorithm using WAE and TAE (k = 0.6 * n-0.9 * n).…”
Section: Location Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figures 5, 6, and 7, TAE was calculated by averaging the best 10% weighted location candidates, that is, k = 0.1 * n in (15). The explanation in the previous paragraph can be confirmed if we look at the results obtained when k is increased up to 0.9 * n. Figure 11: Mean positioning error of the location estimation algorithm using WAE and TAE (k = 0.6 * n-0.9 * n).…”
Section: Location Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless field measurements in some parts of the deployment environment do help to show the performance upper limit of location estimation algorithms using the mapping approach. Location-dependent parameters usually used for mapping include received signal strength [12,14,15] which is the multipath propagation delay profile of the environment. In GSM systems, the bandwidth is too small, unlike the UMTS system, for accurate positioning based on correlation of CIR only [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they can be used in many situations where the A-GPS method cannot be applied, i.e., indoor positioning, but generally with a degradation in accuracy. So far, a wide variety of network-based positioning techniques have been proposed which use measurements obtained within the cellular networks, such as received signal strength (RSS), time of arrival (TOA), time difference of arrival (TDOA), and angle of arrival (AOA) methods [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pattern matching localization method is proposed to overcome the limitations of traditional methods (Bahl, 2000), (Laitinen, 2001), (Ahonen, 2003), (Borkowski, 2005). Under the pattern matching method, a user terminal measures the radio signal pattern, and then, seeks for the most similar pattern in the pattern database, which consists of the radio signal patterns gathered at the specified positions a priori.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the position of the user terminal is estimated. (Bahl, 2000) proposes a pattern matching method for wireless local area networks, while (Laitinen, 2001), (Ahonen, 2003), (Borkowski, 2005) employ the pattern matching in cellular networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%