2001
DOI: 10.2528/pier00080106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Structures for Geometric and Topological Aspects of Finite Element Algorithms

Abstract: Abstract-This paper uses simplicial complexes and simplicial (co)homology theory to expose a foundation for data structures for tetrahedral finite element meshes. Identifying tetrahedral meshes with simplicial complexes leads, by means of Whitney forms, to the connection between simplicial cochains and fields in the region modeled by the mesh. Furthermore, lumped field parameters are tied to matrices associated with simplicial (co)homology groups. The data structures described here are sparse, and the computat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their approach differs from the one presented in this work in that it is restricted to simplicial complexes. Furthermore, there is the work of Gross et al [18], Dobkin et al [11], a survey on data structures for level-of-detail models by De Floriani et al [10], and the 3-dimensional triangulations which are part of the CGAL library described by Teillaud in [31] that are also restricted to simplicial complexes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach differs from the one presented in this work in that it is restricted to simplicial complexes. Furthermore, there is the work of Gross et al [18], Dobkin et al [11], a survey on data structures for level-of-detail models by De Floriani et al [10], and the 3-dimensional triangulations which are part of the CGAL library described by Teillaud in [31] that are also restricted to simplicial complexes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, they naturally split into a metric-dependent part (3) and a purely topological (i.e., metric-free or manifestly invariant under diffeomorphisms) part (4). This is because d is a metric-free operator [12] and, as such, only (3) is modified under a change on the metric (as encoded by the * operator), whereas (4) remains invariant. The second feature is that (3) and (4) can be exactly transcribed onto a irregular lattice because both d and * operators admit well-defined, direct counterpart representations on such lattices.…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining (1) and (2), we arrive at (17) where matrices , , , and are all sparse. By inverting and inverse Fourier transforming the above equation, one has (18) A leap-frog time discretization of the above leads to an explicit time-domain update that unfortunately is full because is full.…”
Section: F Application To Time-domain Femmentioning
confidence: 99%