1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59242-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Structures for Computational Statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus a departure from a parabolic density is also a departure from the standard normal density. For simplicity, Klinke [24] proposes to use the following uniform kernel that we will also consider in what follows.…”
Section: The Friedman-tukey Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus a departure from a parabolic density is also a departure from the standard normal density. For simplicity, Klinke [24] proposes to use the following uniform kernel that we will also consider in what follows.…”
Section: The Friedman-tukey Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these pioneer papers and until the end of the nineties, the field of EPP widely expanded in the statistical literature. Let us quote Huber [21], Jones and Sibson [22], Friedman [14], Cook et al [8], Sun [42], Posse [36], Nason [34] and Klinke [24] among the most famous references of that period. In these articles, several projection indices and optimization algorithms have been proposed and studied in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where h denotes the bandwidth. Following Klinke [2012] for the kernel choice and Silverman [1986] for the bandwidth choice, we use the uniform kernel…”
Section: Projection Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To graphically ascertain the normal distribution of data we can use Quantile-Quantile Plot for normal distribution. Quantile-quantile plots are used to compare the distribution of random variables (Klinke, 2001 Hence for graphical analysis it can be concluded with certain confidence EPS1, EPS2 and EPS3 valuation errors are more tightly and normally distributed as compared to the rest of valuation errors from other value drivers considered here. In other words, normal distribution of valuation errors for EPS forecasted imply that expected valuation error is its 'mode', which in our case is 0.77% -2.81% (refer Table 3 Summary of Descriptive Statistics).…”
Section: Figure 12 Combined Frequency Distribution Of Graph Of All Vamentioning
confidence: 99%