Data Sources for Understanding the Social Determinants of Health: Examples from Two Middle-Income Countries: the 3-D Commission

Abstract

The expansion in the scope, scale, and sources of data on the wider social determinants of health (SDH) in the last decades could bridge gaps in information available for decision-making. However, challenges remain in making data widely available, accessible, and useful towards improving population health. While traditional, government-supported data sources and comparable data are most often used to characterize social determinants, there are still capacity and management constraints on data availability and use. Conversely, privately held data may not be shared. This study reviews and discusses the nature, sources, and uses of data on SDH, with illustrations from two middle-income countries: Kenya and the Philippines. The review highlights opportunities presented by new data sources, including the use of big data technologies, to capture data on social determinants that can be useful to inform population health. We conducted a search between October 2010 and September 2020 for grey and scientific publications on social determinants using a search strategy in PubMed and a manual snowball search. We assessed data sources and the data environment in both Kenya and the Philippines. We found limited evidence of the use of new sources of data to study the wider SDH, as most of the studies available used traditional sources. There was also no evidence of qualitative big data being used. Kenya has more publications using new data sources, except on the labor determinant, than the Philippines. The Philippines has a more consistent distribution of the use of new data sources across the HEALTHY determinants than Kenya, where there is greater variation of the number of publications across determinants. The results suggest that both countries use limited SDH data from new data sources. This limited use could be due to a number of factors including the absence of standardized indicators of SDH, inadequate trust and acceptability of data collection methods, and limited infrastructure to pool, analyze, and translate data. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11524-021-00558-7.

Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, and other large language models for social determinants of health: Current state and future directions

“…Data are often not harmonized nor interoperable across sectors, making data integration a challenge and subsequent analysis/modeling difficult. 29 The lack of standardized terminologies and definitions will also limit semantic interoperability, posing a challenge to the implementation of algorithms. This issue is not specific to LMICs.…”

Enhancing data practices for Whole Health: Strategies for a transformative future

“…Thus, limited resources can significantly impact the ability to collect comprehensive data, especially in the context of data modeling. Data resource constraints can manifest in various ways, including limited access to essential data sources, 46 lack of communication with patients and other stakeholders regarding the measurements, 47 insufficient funding for data collection initiatives, 48 and inadequate technology infrastructure. 49 These constraints hinder the comprehensive data gathering needed to understand and address the upstream factors influencing health outcomes (Table 2 ).…”

Determinants of self-reported chronic disease diagnoses among older persons in South Africa

“… 22 This framework argues that various factors influence health beyond biological factors. 23 , 24 This framework assists in presenting important information that can be used by policymakers, researchers and governments to assist in reducing inequities and promoting better health outcomes. 25 With this, the main objective of the study was to examine the determinants of self-reported chronic disease diagnoses among older persons in South Africa.…”