Data Science Tools for Monitoring the Global Repository Eco-System and its Lines of Evolution

Summann, Friedrich; Czerniak, Andreas; Schirrwagen, Jochen; Pieper, Dirk

doi:10.3390/publications8020035

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…During the second phase of the project, to more effectively track the progression of ORCID, we developed the ORCID DE Monitor at the University of Bielefeld. This dashboard enables the analysis of the adoption and distribution of ORCID iDs at an international scale (Summann et al, 2020). The interface is available in both English and German.…”

Section: Monitoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany

Pampel,

Schrader,

Vierkant

et al. 2024

Learned Publishing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Key points The ORCID DE project, from 2016 to 2022, promoted ORCID in Germany through a project‐driven approach. The project promoted the dissemination of ORCID in Germany. The number of IDs registered for Germany increased from approximately 44,000 in 2016 to 300,070 in 2023. The linkage of ORCID with the bibliographic Gemeinsame Normdatei (GND; translated: Integrated Authority File) standard in German‐speaking countries has contributed to the success of ORCID in Germany. The promotion of ORCID in Germany was based on six central areas: information, consortium, standardization, implementation, monitoring, and networking. The ORCID DE Monitor captures and analyses the development of ORCID on a national and international level. The ACTION principles highlight crucial measures in promoting a standard, such as ORCID. ACTION stands for Awareness, ConnectiviTy, IntegratiOn, and Networking.

show abstract

Section: Monitoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany

Pampel,

Schrader,

Vierkant

et al. 2024

Learned Publishing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…see Lepori, et al 2009) and only two that measure scholarly inclusion. Both projects are prototypes, and target a narrow scope of scholarly content: BASE (Summann et al 2020) aims to use OAI-PMH metadata harvesting to track statistics on the size of collections in institutional repositories worldwide, and reports activity by country. ORION (Stathoulopoulos et al 2020) is a prototype for interactive visualization patterns of metadata describing publications in the life sciences in Microsoft Academic graph: it provides map visualization by gender and region.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Community Tracking Indicators for Open and Inclusive Scholarship

Altman

2022

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is evidence that scholarly processes have bias and create barriers to inclusion; more openness in scholarly communication is needed. Progress towards a better scholarly ecosystem requires comparable, reliable measures of the desired attributes of a better system. This paper describes an initiative in progress to produce standardized indicators that describe the volume and types of open science output systematically over time, using existing open data sources. We describe a replicable to clean, integrate, code, and analyze these sources to enable continuous publication of indicators. And we report on early results from this initiative, demonstrating how these indicators can go beyond “overall impact” measures to advance the understanding of who is, and who is not, participating in open scholarship.

show abstract

“…Достоинством BASE, которая была создана в 2001 г. и первоначально объединяла небольшое число ресурсов репозитория [33], а спустя 20 лет обеспечивает поиск более 340 млн документов, является тот факт, что контент-провайдеры индексируются только после проверки квалифицированным персоналом библиотеки Билефельдского университета. BASE -глобальная научная поисковая система и агрегатор репозиториев [34], позволяющая выявлять «высоко влиятельные цитаты» [32], включающая различные типы документов (книги и главы книги, статьи из газет и журналов, материалы конференций, оборы, лекции и материалы образовательных курсов, рукописи, патенты, диссертации, видео, аудио, карты и др. ), соответствующие конкретным требованиям академического качества и актуальности, а также веб-ресурсы «глубокой паутины», которые игнорируются коммерческими поисковыми системами или теряются в огромном количестве обращений.…”

unclassified

Open scientific content search tools for research and education

Redkina

2024

Prof. obraz. sovrem. mire

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The concept of open science, actively promoted in recent decades, as well as technological innovations, make the culture of information retrieval a significant element in the development of the information society, which has a significant impact on scientific activity, education, management, social processes, etc. Indicators of the level of culture of information retrieval are knowledge of basic methods and means of obtaining information, including skills and abilities to work with information resources and search engines. The culture of information retrieval helps improve the quality of information extraction from increasingly large open information arrays. Open tools for searching scientific content are the most important, but require training during operation, they are components of the global market of information resources and services, allowing the selection of relevant information from large data sets in accordance with user requests.Purpose setting. The study sets the task of studying the applicability of individual scientific search systems (Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Internet Archive Scholar and BASE) for information searching when conducting research and in educational processes, developing competencies to improve the level of information culture of specialists in the field of library and information sciences.Methodology and methods of the study. The research was carried out using comparative and system analysis methods, mathematical methods for processing statistical data, and content analysis of documentary sources of information. The methodological basis was practice-oriented and competency-based approaches aimed at developing the professional skills of librarians and library scientists in searching for digital content and using open access resources.Results. The analysis made it possible to draw conclusions about the capabilities of search systems, methods for retrieving information and the specifics of the reflection of publications in them, as well as the most acceptable conditions for information retrieval in the field of «library and information sciences», which makes it possible to more rationally use the potential of systems and quickly obtain complete and relevant scientific information on the topic.Conclusions. The results of the study add a new dimension to our knowledge of scientific search engines. The study presents evidence that Google Scholar is a powerful tool for searching Russian literature in the field of library science in terms of articles from scientific journals, as well as detecting a limited volume of some other types of publications with the ability to evaluate with Google Scholar Metrics. It is concluded that Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Internet Archive Scholar and BASE, despite being positioned as effective tools for searching scientific information in various disciplines, require caution in use, because these systems cannot guarantee comprehensive results and are not complete sources of bibliographic data, but can be considered in conjunction with other resources, taking into account the availability of advanced search engines and additional services. Knowledge of scientific search engines contributes to improving the culture of information retrieval, the culture of users, their qualifications and professionalism.

show abstract

Data Science Tools for Monitoring the Global Repository Eco-System and its Lines of Evolution

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany

Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany

Designing Community Tracking Indicators for Open and Inclusive Scholarship

Open scientific content search tools for research and education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About