2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data representing applicability of developed growth hormone 1 (GH1) gene detection method for detecting Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) at high specificity to processed salmon commodities

Abstract: This article is referred to the research article entitled “Development of a novel method for specific detection of genetically modified Atlantic salmon, AquAdvantage, using real-time polymerase chain reaction” by Soga et al. (2020).Applicability of the developed growth hormone 1 (GH1) and 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) detection methods using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) to processed food commodities was examined. DNAs extracted and purified from 24 commod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To develop a detection method that could meet the requirements of the revised non-GMO labeling, we focused on reproducibility. We had previously developed simple qualitative detection methods for judging GMOs as positive based on PCR amplification. These simple qualitative detection methods are applicable to general purposes and quite useful, but differences in the performance of PCR instruments may affect the results. In addition, very low copy numbers of the target DNA would be governed by a stochastic Poisson sample distribution and render detection less reliable. , Thus, ensuring reproducible results with normal qualitative detection methods for the revised non-GMO labeling criterion would be difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop a detection method that could meet the requirements of the revised non-GMO labeling, we focused on reproducibility. We had previously developed simple qualitative detection methods for judging GMOs as positive based on PCR amplification. These simple qualitative detection methods are applicable to general purposes and quite useful, but differences in the performance of PCR instruments may affect the results. In addition, very low copy numbers of the target DNA would be governed by a stochastic Poisson sample distribution and render detection less reliable. , Thus, ensuring reproducible results with normal qualitative detection methods for the revised non-GMO labeling criterion would be difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%