Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data reconstruction applications for IoT air pollution sensor networks using graph signal processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferrer-Cid et al [16] developed a graph-based data reconstructed model to perform postprocessing application that arises in real-time lower cost sensor deployment for monitoring air pollution. This data reconstructed model initially defines the relationship among the dissimilar network sensors through a graph learned in the measured dataset, later a signal reconstruction method is employed for reconstructing the sensor dataset.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ferrer-Cid et al [16] developed a graph-based data reconstructed model to perform postprocessing application that arises in real-time lower cost sensor deployment for monitoring air pollution. This data reconstructed model initially defines the relationship among the dissimilar network sensors through a graph learned in the measured dataset, later a signal reconstruction method is employed for reconstructing the sensor dataset.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local movement depends on the decision of whether a fox needs for moving close to the possible victim or stop moving and rest. It can be modelled using the arbitrary selective of variable 𝜇 ∈ 0,1 [19]: 𝑥 = { 𝜇 > 0.75 move closer, 𝜇 ≤ 0.75 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑦 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (16) In such cases, if the fox decided to move, the position change can be defined by using Eq. ( 17)…”
Section: Hyperparameter Tuning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to have daily 24-hour samples, in case of data loss, e.g. due to communication subsystem failures or node maintenance, any imputation method can be applied [31]. In our case, we perform an interpolation (average between previous and next value) if only one sample is missing and discard the whole day if there is more than one loss in one day.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several techniques for discovering the relationships between network sensors, graph signal processing tools have been successfully applied in learning the graph that encodes the implicit relationships between sensors measuring natural phenomena. Thus, we have applied a smoothness-based graph learning technique [31], [32] in order to find the reference instruments most related to the node of interest and include these instruments in the reference station database. The results indicate that two nearby reference instruments can be included in the database for the TPB-D mechanism.…”
Section: Tpb-d Performance Using Nearby Reference Stationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One simple approach to include neighboring data to predict or impute air quality data is to consider spatial distances or correlations between the stations. A more advanced solution to this is graph machine learning, , a subfield of graph signal processing , which allows machine learning on irregularly structured data such as a monitoring network. Graph-based methods have been adopted for air quality-related tasks, such as outlier detection, postprocessing of low-cost sensor data, or high-resolution forecasting. Graph machine learning was shown to be suitable for the imputation of different data sets, yet, to the best of our knowledge, they have not yet been used to impute missing air quality data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%