2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2019.2911690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Rate Fingerprinting: A WLAN-Based Indoor Positioning Technique for Passive Localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RSSI-based technology realizes localization by characterizing the energy attenuation of wireless signals during propagation, which is readily available from commodity WiFi. Several methods combine the RSSI readings from multiple access points (APs) with propagation models and then locate the persons through triangulation [18] or fingerprint collection [19], [20]. However, since RSSI is a coarse characterization of the channel, reliable RSSI-based positioning systems tend to achieve only room-level accuracy.…”
Section: A Passive Indoor Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RSSI-based technology realizes localization by characterizing the energy attenuation of wireless signals during propagation, which is readily available from commodity WiFi. Several methods combine the RSSI readings from multiple access points (APs) with propagation models and then locate the persons through triangulation [18] or fingerprint collection [19], [20]. However, since RSSI is a coarse characterization of the channel, reliable RSSI-based positioning systems tend to achieve only room-level accuracy.…”
Section: A Passive Indoor Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher resolution, larger localization area and more users, passive localization with mobile devices is preferred. Since the data rates at different locations are different, Duan et al [19] exploits data rate information of all available APs as the fingerprints for localization. In order to improve the resolution, their subsequent work [7] includes other fingerprints such as packet delivery ratio (PDR) for localization, which improves the average accuracy to 2.5 m.…”
Section: Phone State Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the WiFi device used in the training phase is different from the actual device used in the testing phase, the localization accuracy could be significantly reduced [7]. To mitigate this problem, one may use special fingerprints such as data rate (DR) [19], RSS ratio [34], RSSI difference [35] to avoid heterogeneity. However, due to power control on the mobile devices, the number of frames or power sent from a mobile device may vary significantly, which makes all of those fingerprints less reliable.…”
Section: Device Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a state-of-the-art technology, Wi-Fi fingerprinting indoor localization systems (IPS) have been extensively researched for both localization [ 6 , 7 ] and activity recognition [ 8 , 9 ] applications. As the radio frequency (RF) characteristics of Wi-Fi signals at each location are unique due to their different propagation paths, the RF characteristics can be considered unique fingerprints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%