2015
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-s2-s2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data quality monitoring and performance metrics of a prospective, population-based observational study of maternal and newborn health in low resource settings

Abstract: BackgroundTo describe quantitative data quality monitoring and performance metrics adopted by the Global Network’s (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR), a maternal and perinatal population-based registry (MPPBR) based in low and middle income countries (LMICs).MethodsOngoing prospective, population-based data on all pregnancy outcomes within defined geographical locations participating in the GN have been collected since 2008. Data quality metrics were defined and are implemented at the cluster, site a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya. 7 Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India. 8 University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya. 7 Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India. 8 University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Global Network's Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) is a prospective, population-based registry implemented in the catchment areas of low-resource countries [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The MNHR began in 2008 in research sites in Argentina, Guatemala, India (2 sites), Pakistan, Kenya and Zambia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, more than 450,000 pregnant women have been enrolled, of which delivery outcome data have been reported for 98.9% of women enrolled and 98% of 42 day follow-up visits, overall. No site has had >5% loss to follow-up at 42 days postpartum [36]. Each site develops a monitoring plan to ensure the quality of the data through assessment of various indicators of completeness of data collection, data quality, data accuracy and data entry.…”
Section: Landmark Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the start of the MNHR, the investigators determined the critical data to collect, developed common definitions based on the WHO criteria, and also defined common methods to collect the data. In addition, the MNHR introduced a process of ongoing data quality monitoring, including metrics to assess missingness and accuracy, which was conducted both with local research teams and centrally, with a process for rapid feedback and resolution of data issues (Table 1) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%