2002
DOI: 10.1177/0193841x02026002002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Quality in Evaluation of an Alcohol-Related Harm Prevention Program

Abstract: The authors report the reliability and convergent validity in a sample of college students for 27 composite scales and two items covering alcohol use, cigarette smoking, marijuana use, and other drug use; beliefs relating to alcohol use; perceived norms for alcohol-related behavior; harm prevention skills; intentions to take prevention action; harm prevention action taken; risk taken; experienced harm; and other health-related behaviors and person characteristics. Data quality assessment strategies and missing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, while we used official records as well as self and parent reports of violent behavior and a well validated scale of depression, we relied only on self reports for heavy drinking. However, reliability and validity of self-reported substance use has been established in many studies (e.g., [35]). Also, we included only substantiated cases of maltreatment, which could under-estimate the extent of maltreatment and may be racially biased [36] (see note 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, while we used official records as well as self and parent reports of violent behavior and a well validated scale of depression, we relied only on self reports for heavy drinking. However, reliability and validity of self-reported substance use has been established in many studies (e.g., [35]). Also, we included only substantiated cases of maltreatment, which could under-estimate the extent of maltreatment and may be racially biased [36] (see note 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, substance use was measured by self-report only, however, reliability and validity of self-report substance use data has been established in several studies (Graham et al, 2002). In addition, the sample came from a single urban area, and results may not generalize to adolescent male populations living in other urban or nonurban areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address missing data in our analysis, we use multiple imputation methods. These methods have been used previously in studies of program efficacy (Graham et al, 2002; Hecht et al, 2003). Although our missing data rate due to attrition was about 40% (1-1744/2894), there are no guidelines regarding how much missing data is too much (Gorelick 2004; Musil et al 2002; Tsikriktsis 2005; Kristman, Manno, and Côté 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%