2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data prediction, compression, and recovery in clustered wireless sensor networks for environmental monitoring applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enabling the sensor node to transmit a reading only when the prediction does not respect the error tolerance predefined the user. The authors in [6] proposed a Hierarchical Least Mean Squares (HLMS) adaptive filter as a prediction model, which is one of the many adaptive filter based approaches [7], [8], [24]. This filter consists of multiple layers of regular Least Mean Square (LMS) filters, each layer takes feedback from the previous layer in the hierarchy aiming to minimize the prediction error of the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enabling the sensor node to transmit a reading only when the prediction does not respect the error tolerance predefined the user. The authors in [6] proposed a Hierarchical Least Mean Squares (HLMS) adaptive filter as a prediction model, which is one of the many adaptive filter based approaches [7], [8], [24]. This filter consists of multiple layers of regular Least Mean Square (LMS) filters, each layer takes feedback from the previous layer in the hierarchy aiming to minimize the prediction error of the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods [23][24][25] make use of statistical models to estimate the readings of nodes. Owing to require few readings to respond of queries, statistical models can drastically reduce the amount of data sent by nodes [26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of single prediction approaches the system performs prediction in only one location whereas in the case of dual prediction approaches the system performs prediction at a local node along with the central server. Some notable prediction schemes applicable for both the categories mentioned above are adaptive filtering scheme [16], Autoregressive filter, Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average filter (ARIMA) [15], Kalman filtering and machine learning techniques [17]. Although some of the prior approaches can provide better accuracy for the model generation at the IoT device however given the severe computational constraints of the IoMT devices these approaches are not practical for local processing.…”
Section: B Prediction Based Iot Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%