Data practices during COVID: Everyday sensemaking in a high‐stakes information ecology

Abstract

How do people reason with data to make sense of the world? What implications might everyday practices hold for data literacy education? We leverage the unique context of the COVID‐19 pandemic to shed light on these questions. COVID‐19 has engendered a complex, multimodal ecology of information resources, with which people engage in high‐stakes sensemaking and decision‐making. We take a relational approach to data literacy, examining how people navigate and interpret data through interactions with tools and other people. Using think‐aloud protocols, a diverse group of people described their COVID‐19 information‐seeking practices while working with COVID‐19 information resources they use routinely. Although participants differed in their disciplinary background and proficiency with data, they each consulted data frequently and used it to make sense of life in the pandemic. Three modes of interacting with data were examined: scanning, looking closer and puzzling through. In each of these modes, we examined the balance of agency between people and their tools; how participants experienced and managed emotions as part of exploring data; and how issues of trust mediated their sensemaking. Our findings provide implications for cultivating more agentic publics, using a relational lens to inform data literacy education. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Many people, even those with higher education, struggle with interpreting quantitative data representations. Social and emotional factors influence cognition and learning. People are often overwhelmed by the abundance of available information online. There is a need for data literacy approaches that are humanistic and relational. What this paper adds Everyday data practices can be variable and adaptable, and include engaging with data at different levels: scanning, looking closer, and puzzling through. Each of these modes involves different data practices. People, independently of their quantitative interpretation skills and disciplinary backgrounds, may engage differently with data (eg, avoiding versus delving deeper) based on their emotional responses, level of trust or interpersonal relationships that are evoked by the data. These everyday data practices have implications for people's sense of their own agency with data and involve emotional and trust‐based relationships that shape their interpretations of data. These relational aspects of data literacy suggest productive directions for data literacy education. Implications for practice and/or policy Data literacy can be taught as a process that is inherently relational, for example, by discussing the ways in which learners are personally connected to different data, what emotions these connections evoke, and how that affects the ways in which they attend to, trust and interpret the data. Data literacy education can cultivate a wider range of data practices at a variety of depths of interaction, rather than prioritizing only in‐depth inquiry. It may be helpful to include complex exp...

Data science education across the disciplines: Underexamined opportunities for K‐12 innovation

“…Different from the other studies focusing on K‐12 learning settings, Radinsky and Tabak (2022) provided unique insights on a timely and important topic, people from different disciplinary and professional backgrounds' sense‐making of COVID‐19 data. They described three categories of practices when participants interacted with COVID‐19 data: scanning, looking closer and puzzling through.…”

What drives the public's use of data? The mediating role of trust in science and data literacy in functional scientific reasoning concerning COVID‐19

“…Although this study did not observe participants in their naturalistic settings, the survey serves as a proxy for everyday engagement through its focus on reasoning around topics, data, and functional questions similar to those prevalent in the public sphere at the time. Interviews in which people described their information behavior during COVID‐19 (Radinsky & Tabak, 2022) and analyses of COVID‐19 information consumption (Bowe et al, 2020) support the veracity of this proxy. Below, we present the overall logic of our study and follow with details and specific rationale for each component of the survey in the Methods section.…”

Az adatműveltség és a COVID-19 válság

“…Célja ugyanis az, hogy szabványosított és megismételhető folyamatokra építve átláthatóvá tegye az adatokkal kapcsolatos döntéshozatalt. 26 Nem téveszthetjük ugyanakkor szem elől, hogy az adatkormányzás is igényli az adatműveltséget, ami megerősíti azt a meggyőződést is, hogy könyvtárosként, kutatóként és állampolgárként is jó, ha ismerjük a tudományos (kutatási) adatok jellemzőit.…”