2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data on mitochondrial ultrastructure of photoreceptors in pig, rabbit, and mouse retinas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cone PR morphology and distribution are 2 main identifying characteristics in AO images ( 51 53 ). Pig cone PR diameter in our study was within the range of previously reported human cone PR diameter (3.0 ± 0.4 μm to 8.2 ± 0.6 μm; mean ± SD) ( 54 , 55 ). In our data, the cone PR density at the baseline was consistent with Huckenpahler ( 51 ) and comparable with spacing and density of human cones PRs imaged at 4° eccentricity using the same AO system used in our study ( 52 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Cone PR morphology and distribution are 2 main identifying characteristics in AO images ( 51 53 ). Pig cone PR diameter in our study was within the range of previously reported human cone PR diameter (3.0 ± 0.4 μm to 8.2 ± 0.6 μm; mean ± SD) ( 54 , 55 ). In our data, the cone PR density at the baseline was consistent with Huckenpahler ( 51 ) and comparable with spacing and density of human cones PRs imaged at 4° eccentricity using the same AO system used in our study ( 52 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Mitochondrial number was determined using FEI software. Mitochondrial surface area and perimeter were analyzed on the same images using the iTEM software, and these data are represented normalized per field, as previously reported (Costa et al , 2010; Naon et al , 2016; Quintana‐Cabrera et al , 2018; Indrieri et al , 2019; Tsakiri et al , 2019; Xia et al , 2019; Ozaki et al , 2020; Anastasia et al , 2021; Mirra et al , 2021). The researchers in charge of producing the TEM images were blind to the genotypes of the animals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TEM was performed to compare the mitochondrial morphological features of WT and ES1 -KO mice. The method of sampling was the same as that reported by Ozaki et al [35] . The brains were obtained from WT and ES1 -KO mice and stored in a fixative solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde, 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) overnight at 4°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%