2021
DOI: 10.5815/ijitcs.2021.05.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Mining for Cyberbullying and Harassment Detection in Arabic Texts

Abstract: Broadly cyberbullying is viewed as a severe social danger that influences many individuals around the globe, particularly young people and teenagers. The Arabic world has embraced technology and continues using it in different ways to communicate inside social media platforms. However, the Arabic text has drawbacks for its complexity, challenges, and scarcity of its resources. This paper investigates several questions related to the content of how to protect an Arabic text from cyberbullying/harassment through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-entropy loss that was evaluated throughout various epochs within the configuration demonstrated effective convergence, suggesting an optimal level of performance for the model. In the results obtained by [20], it was shown that cyberbullying detection by LSTM achieved an accuracy of 72%, and this performance increased from 65% to 72% after 10 epochs, while machine learning classifiers only achieved an accuracy of less than 70%. Finally, according to [25] they evaluated the LSTM model and revealed that LSTM was a viable method for identifying comments that were aggressive online, with an accuracy of 93.84% and an f score of 0.94.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cross-entropy loss that was evaluated throughout various epochs within the configuration demonstrated effective convergence, suggesting an optimal level of performance for the model. In the results obtained by [20], it was shown that cyberbullying detection by LSTM achieved an accuracy of 72%, and this performance increased from 65% to 72% after 10 epochs, while machine learning classifiers only achieved an accuracy of less than 70%. Finally, according to [25] they evaluated the LSTM model and revealed that LSTM was a viable method for identifying comments that were aggressive online, with an accuracy of 93.84% and an f score of 0.94.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This particular embedding option (Keras) stands out since it is task-specific. By including semantics instead of just features obtained from raw text, word embedding enhanced the suggested model's level of accuracy in comparison to other conventional detection approaches [20].…”
Section: Word Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in the classification method, several classification techniques are compared, including K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Naive Bayes. Prediction of cyber bullying is done using the K-Nearest Neighbor technique but focuses on positive comments even though there are potential negative comments [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data mining analysis was also proposed by Bashir with the concept of analyzing different Arabic texts previously in the Korean context. Arabic has a high complexity [10]. The concept that is built is only a protection not to predict.…”
Section: Theoretical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital environment may open new ways to perpetrate violence against children. Open access to the Internet, difficulties in tracking the abuser, fear of parents' reaction to cyberthreats [2][3] and, as a result, the concealment of cyberbullying [4][5] make the child easy prey. Crises, such as pandemics, may lead to an increased risk of online harm, considering that children spend more time on virtual platforms [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%