2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19163451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Mining and Statistical Approaches in Debris-Flow Susceptibility Modelling Using Airborne LiDAR Data

Abstract: Cameron Highland is a popular tourist hub in the mountainous area of Peninsular Malaysia. Most communities in this area suffer frequent incidence of debris flow, especially during monsoon seasons. Despite the loss of lives and properties recorded annually from debris flow, most studies in the region concentrate on landslides and flood susceptibilities. In this study, debris-flow susceptibility prediction was carried out using two data mining techniques; Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) and Suppo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
(383 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Satellite based and ground based networks like synthetic aperture radars (SAR), light detection and ranging (LiDAR), etc. are also used to monitor the slopes in real time [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Multi-interfero-metric techniques like Permanent Scatterer Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (PSInSAR) can be used for ground displacement studies with very high accuracy [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite based and ground based networks like synthetic aperture radars (SAR), light detection and ranging (LiDAR), etc. are also used to monitor the slopes in real time [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Multi-interfero-metric techniques like Permanent Scatterer Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (PSInSAR) can be used for ground displacement studies with very high accuracy [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Figure 6 depicts the ROC curves of the used models. Note that plotting this curve is a common way for evaluating the accuracy of prediction for diagnostic problems [45], and shows the specificity versus sensitivity [46,47]. According to this figure, the EHO surpasses other models as it achieved the largest accuracy of prediction (AUROC = 0.758).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 shows the number of models in 100fold bootstrap step that included each predictor. The higher was the number of the models which considered a particular variable; the higher was its significance in influencing the outcomes (Lay et al 2019). Slope angle and land use were selected by all the models in each study area, resulting the parameters that had the Table 6 Range of the rainfall features (3-day and 30-day cumulated rainfall) and of the soil saturation degree at the beginning of an event for the shallow landslides triggering events occurred in Versa-Scuropasso and Ardivestra catchments in 2007-2018 time span Each test-site presented other significant predictors, represented in particular by aspect and topographic position index in Versa-Scuropasso area, and by bedrock geology and catchment area in Ardivestra catchment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%