Data Management Using the Personal Digital Assistant in an Acute Pain Service

Abstract

Handheld personal digital assistants (PDA) are increasingly being used by physicians for a variety of information and data management purposes. We evaluated a PDA-based data management system for our acute pain service. A structured questionnaire survey was conducted to assess staff experience and attitude towards the paper system before the introduction of the PDA, and three months after introduction of the PDA system. We compared the time taken to conduct the acute pain round before and after the implementation of the PDA. The time saved in data management and the amount of paper saved were estimated. Data from 177 patients with a total of 635 acute pain follow-up visits were entered over a three-month period. User satisfaction, ease of access to drug reference and clinical guidelines were similar between the two systems. The respondents found that the PDA was easy to use but less so than the paper system (P=0.007), in particular, when accessing a patient's cumulative data (P=0.007). There was no missed follow-up or data entry with the use of PDA. The time taken to attend follow-up visits was similar for the two systems (Paper: 8.8±3.2 compared to PDA: 7.0±2.0 minutes, P=0.151). The estimated annual amount of paper and time saved in data management was 650 sheets and 130 man-hours respectively. Our experience with the use of the PDA in APS was satisfactory. The PDA system can potentially reduce time and paper use and missed data entry and patient follow-up.

Handheld computers for data entry: high tech has its problems too

“…As reported elsewhere, [6] we experienced a number of technical problems with uploading and downloading data that caused frustration and dissatisfaction. This may have been reduced using a wireless system.…”

Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant

“…6 It has been emphasised that the electronic approach to data collection provides opportunities for future clinical practice and research within many different medical areas. [10][11][12][13] At OMERACT-7 in 2004 it was agreed that information technology data collection techniques for outcome assessment should be adequately validated. 9 A few publications have appeared previously in rheumatology journals in this area-for example, focusing on the validity of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) patient assessment questionnaire 14 15 and on a computerised version of the short form 36 item health assessment questionnaire (SF-36) in patients with rheumatic diseases.…”

Implementing mobile devices to reduce non-rostered workload for junior doctors

“…This idea was thought to be sustainable because: 1) the implementation of similar measures in other hospitals 13 14 2) its ability to tie in to further quality improvement changes such as electronic requests, 3) it would lead to a significant time saving for surgical house officers, and 4) it would enable access to the most up-to-date patient investigations, improving the accuracy of information provided.…”