Data management in multi-method surface analysis

Brandl, K. W.; B�hmig, S. D.; Dreschler, G.; Reichl, B. M.; St�ri, H.

doi:10.1007/bf00322085

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…is possible. In the present implementation a data-check function [3] within the editor session is needed to evaluate the syntax of the user input and in case of an error to reinvoke the editor. In a latter version it is planned to replace the editor session and the data-check function by a customised graphical user interface, which checks for syntactical and semantic errors during the input.…”

Section: Data Conversionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If the sample is analysed by several surface analytical instruments in different laboratories the sample history should be kept together with the sample itself (e.g. on a transportable storage-medium such as a floppy-disc) and should be automatically (input of pointers to single measurement) and manually (comments) updated after every measurement series [3].…”

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We decided to split up data gathered manually or automatically in the course of the measurements into five different groups [3] …”

Section: Format Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, any dated state of the present or the past of the instrument including all hardware components as heater, vacuum equipment, ion gun, etc. can be accessed by a viewing tool [3].…”

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hubertus Nickel on the occasion of his 65th birthday ** To whom correspondence should be addressed At our point of view as complete as possible documentation of the measurements performed has to be an integral part of a data management system in multimethod analysis. Our ideas on such an approach were first published in [3,4].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A new data management concept for AES and SAM

et al. 1997

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The problem of interchangeability of surface analytical data is gaining increasing importance in multi-method surface analysis. There are various surface analytical instruments in different laboratories on several automation levels. For these instruments, which are controlled by computer systems working with companyspecific software under various operating systems, a standardised data format is necessary to allow an exchange of data. Therefore, we are developing a software package for the transfer, archiving and editing of surface analytical data called MAXMIND (management and exchange of method independent data), which is based on punic domain software products. It allows the storage of all available and necessary information on experimental conditions and all parameters specific for a number of analytical techniques such as AES, SAM, XPS, SIMS, STM and AFM. Additionally, all data concerning the sample-preparation and the state of the instrument are included in order to allow a well-founded evaluation of the data and improved reproducibility of the experiment. This concept is demonstrated in detail for the two Auger techniques AES (Auger Electron Spectroscopy) and SAM (Scanning Auger Microscopy).

show abstract

Section: Data Conversionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We decided to split up data gathered manually or automatically in the course of the measurements into five different groups [3] …”

Section: Format Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, any dated state of the present or the past of the instrument including all hardware components as heater, vacuum equipment, ion gun, etc. can be accessed by a viewing tool [3].…”

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations