“…Some studies included density, queue length, exposure to traffic(Lee et al, 2003a), hazard ratio for average volume (Abdel-Aty and, complex calculation of shockwaves(Yu and Abdel-Aty, 2005), safe stopping distance of individual vehicles(Son et al, 2008), average flow ratio calculated from the peak flow(Pande and Abdel-Aty, 2006b), congestion index(Dias et al, 2009; Muromachi, 2012, 2013a; Shi and Abdel-Aty 2015;, percentage of heavy vehicles(Pham et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2017b;Park et al, 2018), geometric mean of average flow ratios(Qu et al, 2012b), average journey time(Katrakazas et al, 2017) first order autocorrelation of count, speed and occupancy(Xu et al, 2014b), weaving volume ratio, speed difference between the beginning and end of weaving segment(Wang et al, 2015) as variables. Use of coarser data such as peak hour traffic data(Abdel-Aty et al, 2006c;Christoforou et al, 2011), 75th percentile of average, standard deviation and coefficient of variation of speed, 75th percentile of standard deviation and coefficient of variation of volume(Abdel-Aty et al, 2006c), or day of week(Xu et al, 2016b), mainly seen in conventional CPMs, were also practiced.RTCPMs built with microscopic traffic flow data also introduced traffic pressure, kinetic energy, coefficient of variation of time headway, mean velocity gradient and mean reaction time as variables(Hourdakis et al, 2006;Paikari et al, 2014). Abdel-Aty et al(2012) represented speed as both time and space mean speeds.…”