The Handbook of Language Variation and Change 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118335598.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data in the Study of Variation and Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, I build on my recent comments in Kendall (2013a) in two areas: considering the time frames of data preservation (Section ) and the importance of open, non‐proprietary file formats (Section ). Again, these are not meant to be an exhaustive set of topics of importance for data portability , but rather my goal is to dig deeper into just two areas where the recent literature (e.g., Bird and Simons ; Goldman et al ; Austin ; Kretzschmar et al ; Kendall , ; Schilling , ch. 6) has had important things to say but which still have much room for further interrogation.…”
Section: Data Preservation and The Portability Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, I build on my recent comments in Kendall (2013a) in two areas: considering the time frames of data preservation (Section ) and the importance of open, non‐proprietary file formats (Section ). Again, these are not meant to be an exhaustive set of topics of importance for data portability , but rather my goal is to dig deeper into just two areas where the recent literature (e.g., Bird and Simons ; Goldman et al ; Austin ; Kretzschmar et al ; Kendall , ; Schilling , ch. 6) has had important things to say but which still have much room for further interrogation.…”
Section: Data Preservation and The Portability Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labov et al ), to name just a few), but it seems to be becoming fairly common practice in sociolinguistics to refer to even our small data collections as ‘corpora’ or ‘databases’ using proper names to describe them in our research (e.g., the fictitious Corpus of Oregonian English ). I will argue that quite often, these ‘corpora’ are not corpora in the sense that corpus linguists use the term – publically accessible, large, machine‐readable resources (see McEnery and Wilson ; Kendall , ). This is fine – of course – as terms are just terms and different (sub‐)disciplines can use terms differently, but the practice of naming small datasets can be misleading, especially if those data are not shareable or accessible by others.…”
Section: Data Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation