2023
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.c.6529031
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data from Phase I Study of Rapid Alternation of Sunitinib and Regorafenib for the Treatment of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Refractory Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Abstract: <div>AbstractPurpose:<p>Polyclonal emergence of KIT secondary mutations is a main mechanism of imatinib progression in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Approved KIT inhibitors sunitinib and regorafenib have complementary activity against KIT resistance mutations. Preclinical evidence suggests that rapid alternation of sunitinib and regorafenib broadens the spectrum of imatinib-resistant subclones targeted.</p>Patients and Methods:<p>Phase Ib study investigating continuous treatmen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sunitinib and regorafenib are respectively licensed as second and third line agents for GIST [1]. However, it is difficult to collate how GIST genotype predicts patient response to these two drugs because these patients would, by definition, have progressed on imatinib therapy and for the most part, have therefore manifested secondary KIT or PDGFRA mutations [14,27,28]. Not only would it then be difficult to determine whether and how the primary and secondary mutations affected drug sensitivity but it is well recognised that secondary mutations may be heterogeneous between different tumour deposits and even within the same deposit [6,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sunitinib and regorafenib are respectively licensed as second and third line agents for GIST [1]. However, it is difficult to collate how GIST genotype predicts patient response to these two drugs because these patients would, by definition, have progressed on imatinib therapy and for the most part, have therefore manifested secondary KIT or PDGFRA mutations [14,27,28]. Not only would it then be difficult to determine whether and how the primary and secondary mutations affected drug sensitivity but it is well recognised that secondary mutations may be heterogeneous between different tumour deposits and even within the same deposit [6,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%