2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2014.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data for studying earnings, the distribution of household income and poverty in China

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, all these surveys collect some form of consumption (or income data), but opinion varies on their suitability to produce the national poverty rate. For example, Gustafsson et al (2014) argue that out of all the listed Chinese surveys (and some others), the cross-sectional CHIP provides the most comprehensive measure of different household income components. Dang and Lanjouw (2018) also point out that compared to the cross-sectional Indian NSS, 8 the panel India Human Development Survey (IHDS) collects a much-reduced version of household consumption data (i.e.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, all these surveys collect some form of consumption (or income data), but opinion varies on their suitability to produce the national poverty rate. For example, Gustafsson et al (2014) argue that out of all the listed Chinese surveys (and some others), the cross-sectional CHIP provides the most comprehensive measure of different household income components. Dang and Lanjouw (2018) also point out that compared to the cross-sectional Indian NSS, 8 the panel India Human Development Survey (IHDS) collects a much-reduced version of household consumption data (i.e.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrying on the tradition of Social Indicators Research in publishing psychometric studies for China, the Special Issue contains a psychometric study by Kitty Chan, Verplanken Bas and Suzanne Skevington. One of the advantages of doing social science research on China is the recent mushrooming in the number of household-level datasets (see Gustafsson et al 2014, for an overview). Many of these household-level datasets have questions relating to wellbeing.…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'Rural Fixed Observation Points Survey' (RFOPS) is a longitudinal survey that aims to collect rural socio-economic information on the same households and villages through time. It started in 1986 and covers around 23,000 households in 360 villages located in 30 provinces in mainland China, excluding Tibet (Gustafsson et al, 2014). A stratified random sampling approach is used (Yao, 2011).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stratified random sampling approach is used (Yao, 2011). 5 The RFOPS carries out annual surveys among households and village leaders to collect basic information such as land utilization, labor inputs, agricultural production, income, and expenditures (Xu et al, 2012;Gustafsson et al, 2014). Enumerators assist households to complete questionnaires, and the interviewed households are revisited annually.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation