2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0368-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data extraction for complex meta-analysis (DECiMAL) guide

Abstract: As more complex meta-analytical techniques such as network and multivariate meta-analyses become increasingly common, further pressures are placed on reviewers to extract data in a systematic and consistent manner. Failing to do this appropriately wastes time, resources and jeopardises accuracy. This guide (data extraction for complex meta-analysis (DECiMAL)) suggests a number of points to consider when collecting data, primarily aimed at systematic reviewers preparing data for meta-analysis. Network meta-anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(2 reference statements)
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmacological interventions for treating asthma are rarely supported by strong certainty or high‐quality evidence and clinical trials are often underpowered . This study provides evidence from the quantitative synthesis of clinical trials in agreement with the current guidelines and recommendations for improving the transparency, accuracy, completeness and frequency of documented meta‐analysis protocols, namely PRISMA‐P, PROSPERO, GRADE and DECiMAL . Thus, our findings can be ranked at the highest level of the current hierarchy of evidence .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pharmacological interventions for treating asthma are rarely supported by strong certainty or high‐quality evidence and clinical trials are often underpowered . This study provides evidence from the quantitative synthesis of clinical trials in agreement with the current guidelines and recommendations for improving the transparency, accuracy, completeness and frequency of documented meta‐analysis protocols, namely PRISMA‐P, PROSPERO, GRADE and DECiMAL . Thus, our findings can be ranked at the highest level of the current hierarchy of evidence .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Data from included studies were extracted and checked for study characteristics, enrolled animals with age and body weight, drugs and regimen of administration, clinical score, induction of clinical signs, inhaler devices and spacers, lung function (maximum change in transpulmonary pressure [ΔPpl max ], pulmonary resistance [R L ], dynamic lung compliance [C dyn ]) and Jadad score. Data were extracted at the different time points available in the studies in agreement with DECiMAL recommendations . When needed, mean and standard deviation (s.d.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were double extracted in a structured form, using a guide developed by the authors for Data Extraction for Complex Meta‐anALysis (DECiMAL), independently by two reviewers . Discrepancies in data extraction were addressed by a senior reviewer who resolved any conflicts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this paper flows smoothly when read, it would not be easy to replicate its experiments because of the lack of those minute details that mercilessly break down narration and make the modern Materials and Method sections so typically dry and unpleasant to read and yet so essential, when those details are needed. Furthermore, it must be admitted that is not easy to compare data and it is not easy to extract data for metanalysis purposes [92], when expressed narratively. Considering the staggering abundance of available scientific literature for any field of science and any specialty in the biomedical area, these limits cannot be overlooked.…”
Section: Storytellingmentioning
confidence: 99%