1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00303-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data envelopment analysis: Visualizing the results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one is based on the hypothesis of constant returns to scale (CRS), while the two remaining models assume the hypothesis of 7 To run the DEA model, personnel expenses and administration expenses have been summarised into a single variable in order to avoid an excessive number of inputs so that the proposed model can be accepted regarding the total number of variables (El-Mahgary and Ladhelma, 1995). All models show high efficiency scores for all years, which implies that the process …”
Section: Dea Efficiency Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is based on the hypothesis of constant returns to scale (CRS), while the two remaining models assume the hypothesis of 7 To run the DEA model, personnel expenses and administration expenses have been summarised into a single variable in order to avoid an excessive number of inputs so that the proposed model can be accepted regarding the total number of variables (El-Mahgary and Ladhelma, 1995). All models show high efficiency scores for all years, which implies that the process …”
Section: Dea Efficiency Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…return per taxpayer and tax; 10 and, 3) personnel numbers (STAFF) in the employ one of the offices under analysis, taking in both contractual staff and civil serva A number of these inputs have also been selected by other authors when a efficiency within their respective tax administrations: Barros This paper also takes into account variances in fiscal capacity between office conditions the output obtained in each case (Esteller, 2003), to which end the ou weighted by the GDP per capita (hereinafter GDPpc) of the respective province in to average GDPpc at national level. Thus, two models are presented: in the fir the output (IAL) is calculated without GDP weighting, and in the second, th (IALc) is adjusted in accordance with GDP.…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once computation of efficiency scores have been computed there are multiple ways to display and compare results (El-Mahgary and Lahdelma, 1995). We consider some methods which provide us with more accurate information (see, for instance Li, 1996;Li et al, 2009 …”
Section: Testing the Closeness Between Efficiency Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%