2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2911577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Envelopment Analysis and Tobit Analysis for Firm Efficiency in Perspective of Working Capital Management in Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the firm's efficiency, which is the dependent variable, is calculated. The value of efficiency ranges between 1 and 0 [23]. For the ith firm, Tobit analysis can be explained by the following mathematical expressions:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the firm's efficiency, which is the dependent variable, is calculated. The value of efficiency ranges between 1 and 0 [23]. For the ith firm, Tobit analysis can be explained by the following mathematical expressions:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCC, CCE and NWCL are taken as the explained variables for measuring WCM efficiency of listed manufacturing firms in India. CCC is calculated as addition of receivables days with inventory days and then subtracting payables days from it (Ahmad et al , 2017). CCE is calculated as the ratio of net cash flow from operations to sales (Filbeck and Krueger, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Subsequently, a linear Ordinary-Least-Squares (OLS) regression may lead to invalid results, since “the effect of explanatory variables tends to be non-linear and the variance tends to decrease when the mean gets closer to one of the boundaries” (Buis, 2010). A common practice is to use a Tobit Model as applied, inter alia, in the work of Ahmada, Ishtiaq, Hamid, Khurram, and Nawaz (2017), Spaho (2015), and Standfuss (2013). This regression type enables the limitation of values to an upper and a lower boundary but requires a positive probability for both limitation values.…”
Section: Approach and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%