2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven techniques for fault detection in anaerobic digestion process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sánchez-Fernández et al (2018) considered dissolved oxygen sensor faults in the Benchmark Simulation Model No.2 (BSM2) and found that the univariate EWMA chart on residuals performed as well, or better, than multivariate monitoring using principal component analysis (PCA) with T 2 and Q statistics. Similarly, Kazemi et al (2021) reached the same conclusion but for the univariate CUSUM chart when monitoring residuals; they tested a process fault, as well as bias and drift faults on a pH sensor, and showed that the CUSUM chart outperformed the multivariate monitoring for small fault sizes, and in the cases with missing data. Finally, Riss et al (2021) used a modified CUSUM chart, based on the median, and combined it with the random forest method to successfully perform fault detection on real data from a WWTP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Sánchez-Fernández et al (2018) considered dissolved oxygen sensor faults in the Benchmark Simulation Model No.2 (BSM2) and found that the univariate EWMA chart on residuals performed as well, or better, than multivariate monitoring using principal component analysis (PCA) with T 2 and Q statistics. Similarly, Kazemi et al (2021) reached the same conclusion but for the univariate CUSUM chart when monitoring residuals; they tested a process fault, as well as bias and drift faults on a pH sensor, and showed that the CUSUM chart outperformed the multivariate monitoring for small fault sizes, and in the cases with missing data. Finally, Riss et al (2021) used a modified CUSUM chart, based on the median, and combined it with the random forest method to successfully perform fault detection on real data from a WWTP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The development of an appropriate mathematical model for the AD process has been the focus of much research due to its critical role in improving laboratory studies, more effective process performance through automated process control, and optimization of AD system design and control strategies [90]. In contrast, the AD process is a highly structured, complex, dynamic, non-linear system, making it difficult to model [91]. However, in 2002, the most predominant, highly structured, and generic model which described the overall AD process was established by the International Water Association (IWA) task group, i.e., ADM1.…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Of the Ad Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was evaluated on simulated dry weather data and the authors state that the method was superior to existing methods and can reduce operating costs and improve the monitoring of the influent [15]. Kazemi et al [16] showed that incremental PCA was able to distinguish between time varying events and faults in simulated data, while Kazemi et al [17] investigated a number of technics including Support Vector Machine, Ensemble Neural Network and Extreme Learning and found that they performed better than a PCA based method after testing on simulated data. Luca et al [18] applied PCA and statistic for fault detection in DO sensors in simulated data and stated that the method was successful in detecting the faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%