2021
DOI: 10.1049/cth2.12093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data‐driven parameter tuning for rational feedforward controller: Achieving optimal estimation via instrumental variable

Abstract: Feedforward control has been widely used to improve the tracking performance of precision motion systems. This paper develops a new data-driven feedforward tuning approach associated with rational basis functions. The aim is to obtain the global optimum with optimal estimation accuracy. First, the instrumental variable is employed to ensure the unbiased estimation of the global optimum. Then, the optimal instrumental variable which leads to the highest estimation accuracy is derived, and a new refined instrume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two kinds of calculation in the iterative procedure: local optimum and global optimum. The local optimum is the best position the particle has ever achieved by comparing it with the preceding particles (Long et al, 2018), whereas the global optimum is one of the best positions of particles compared to the whole particle (Huang et al, 2021). There are several composing factors in the PSO algorithm (Alfarisy et al, 2018), detailed as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two kinds of calculation in the iterative procedure: local optimum and global optimum. The local optimum is the best position the particle has ever achieved by comparing it with the preceding particles (Long et al, 2018), whereas the global optimum is one of the best positions of particles compared to the whole particle (Huang et al, 2021). There are several composing factors in the PSO algorithm (Alfarisy et al, 2018), detailed as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional model-based feedforward controllers are generally in the form of polynomial functions [18] or rational functions [19], which can be utilized to approximate plant inversions. To deal with nonminimum phase zeros caused by time delay and zero-order hold sampling in real-time control systems, several famous model-based feedforward controller structures have also been proposed, such as zero-phase-error tracking control (ZPETC) [20], [21], zero-magnitude-error tracking control (ZMETC) [22], [23], and nonminimumphase-zero-ignore tracking control (NMPZITC) [24], [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global optimal parameters of the feedforward controller were obtained by linear least‐squares method based on the optimal feedforward control force obtained by ILC, and a stable approximation approach on the basis of zero‐phase‐error tracking algorithm was presented to deal with the possible instability problem. The data‐driven feedforward tuning method based on rational basis functions was further developed in [28]. A global optimum estimation for the parameters of a feedforward controller was obtained via an optimal instrumental variable and a novel iterative learning law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%