2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-016-1144-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven, In Situ, Relative Sensor Calibration Based on Waveform Fitting Moment Tensor Inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shear seismic events are often dominant in actual production fields (Maxwell & Cipolla 2011;Šílený et al 2014;Staněk & Eisner 2017) and in situ experiments (Ishida et al 2019). Previous studies of hydraulic fracturing in the laboratory also showed that significant proportions of induced seismic events were shear-type for rocks such as shale (Bennour et al 2015;Zhang et al 2019), sandstone (Stoeckhert et al 2015;Rodriguez et al 2017), slate (Stoeckhert et al 2015) and granite (Ishida et al 2016;Yamamoto et al 2019), even for experiments adopting loading conditions and sample sizes similar to those used in the present study (Yamamoto et al 2019). Although moment tensor analysis for laboratory-observed AE events is difficult because of the complicated characteristics of AE sensors, such studies also reported that a significant proportion of AE events were shear-type (Rodriguez et al 2017;Yamamoto et al 2019).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Dominant Focal Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear seismic events are often dominant in actual production fields (Maxwell & Cipolla 2011;Šílený et al 2014;Staněk & Eisner 2017) and in situ experiments (Ishida et al 2019). Previous studies of hydraulic fracturing in the laboratory also showed that significant proportions of induced seismic events were shear-type for rocks such as shale (Bennour et al 2015;Zhang et al 2019), sandstone (Stoeckhert et al 2015;Rodriguez et al 2017), slate (Stoeckhert et al 2015) and granite (Ishida et al 2016;Yamamoto et al 2019), even for experiments adopting loading conditions and sample sizes similar to those used in the present study (Yamamoto et al 2019). Although moment tensor analysis for laboratory-observed AE events is difficult because of the complicated characteristics of AE sensors, such studies also reported that a significant proportion of AE events were shear-type (Rodriguez et al 2017;Yamamoto et al 2019).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Dominant Focal Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainties in wave propagation velocities can take four forms: measuring procedure, homogeneous assumption, time‐invariance assumption, and dispersion. For the shear wave velocities, uncertainty can also be expected from their interpretation via processing rather than direct measurements (see Vera Rodriguez et al, , for details on the derivation of shear wave velocity in this data set). Uncertainties from the measuring procedure are neglected in our analysis because their magnitude is small compared to the other three sources of error.…”
Section: Modeling Of Different Sources Of Uncertainty On the Estimatementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Model heterogeneity can be glimpsed from the variation in compressional velocities measured with ultrasonic pulses along different travel paths between transducers (see Vera Rodriguez et al, , for details of the compressional velocities measured in this experiment). From the magnitude of this variation, we estimate that the uncertainty introduced by neglecting the velocity heterogeneity of the block lies on the order of 6%.…”
Section: Modeling Of Different Sources Of Uncertainty On the Estimatementioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations