DOI: 10.17077/etd.jj4u-kfv0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven framework for forecasting sedimentation at culverts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
(118 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several papers have considered the use of constraints (based on physical knowledge) on the output of a machine learning model so that these mod- els can be trained even with unlabeled data by relying on physical principles [10,18,22]. Another very common approach is residual modeling, where an ML model is used to predict the errors made by a physics-based model [2,3,24]. In addition to generating results that may be inconsistent with physical laws, these residual modeling approaches do not have the capability to train ML models with unlabeled data by relying on physical principles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several papers have considered the use of constraints (based on physical knowledge) on the output of a machine learning model so that these mod- els can be trained even with unlabeled data by relying on physical principles [10,18,22]. Another very common approach is residual modeling, where an ML model is used to predict the errors made by a physics-based model [2,3,24]. In addition to generating results that may be inconsistent with physical laws, these residual modeling approaches do not have the capability to train ML models with unlabeled data by relying on physical principles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%