2019 15th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/cnsm46954.2019.9012691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Emulation of Mobile Access Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We make ERRANT open source and available to the community [9] to allow practitioners to test their applications and researchers to reproduce the results. This paper extends our preliminary work [10], where we already have shown the potentialities and limitations of using a data-driven emulator. We expanded our work from many points of view: (i) we now rely on a large-scale speed test measurement campaign; (ii) we provide a fully-fledged network emulator that models not only latency but also download and upload bandwidth; (iii) we show practical use cases to illustrate the benefits of our proposal in understanding the behavior of user applications with a particular focus on web browsing and video streaming; (iv) we provide an open source tool to emulate mobile networks in different operators, locations, and technologies.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We make ERRANT open source and available to the community [9] to allow practitioners to test their applications and researchers to reproduce the results. This paper extends our preliminary work [10], where we already have shown the potentialities and limitations of using a data-driven emulator. We expanded our work from many points of view: (i) we now rely on a large-scale speed test measurement campaign; (ii) we provide a fully-fledged network emulator that models not only latency but also download and upload bandwidth; (iii) we show practical use cases to illustrate the benefits of our proposal in understanding the behavior of user applications with a particular focus on web browsing and video streaming; (iv) we provide an open source tool to emulate mobile networks in different operators, locations, and technologies.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…9 For our experiments, we consider three popular websites, chosen from the globally top-ranked in the Alexa ranking service, namely: Wikipedia, Google, and YouTube. 10 We then instrument Google Chrome to automatically visit the homepages of the selected websites using the Browsertime toolset. 11 In parallel, we use ERRANT to varying network conditions, using all the 32 profiles we built.…”
Section: Web Browsing Qoe Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This alternative communication method allows us to compare alternative communication approaches with the blockchain, either directly or via the MQTT middleware. A cellular network emulator was also employed [ 30 ], to provide a more realistic testing environment. This emulator consists of a NetEm (Network Emulator) [ 31 ] profile to emulate mobile data communications in 4G network environments with roaming.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluation Of the Proposed Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work by [18] provides performance data for cellular networks in a range of conditions [18], and this was used to select representative parameters for tc. In order to assess the performance comparison in a range of conditions, ten different cases were selected.…”
Section: Network Condition Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the performance comparison in a range of conditions, ten different cases were selected. These were drawn from a software implementation of the [18] dataset produced by [19]. The cases selected ranged from the theoretical 'best case' (where all devices were running on the same Local Area Network (LAN)) through to simulations of Fourth-Generation (4G) and Third-Generation (3G) cellular networks (which, in turn, ranged from 'good' to 'poor' signal strength).…”
Section: Network Condition Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%