2016 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/haptics.2016.7463169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven comparison of four cutaneous displays for pinching palpation in robotic surgery

Abstract: Current teleoperated surgical robots do not provide surgeons with haptic feedback, due in part to the safety risks associated with grounded kinesthetic forces. Ungrounded cutaneous feedback provides an elegant and inherently stable way to refer haptic feedback to the surgeon in such situations. Choosing the most appropriate display, however, is challenging given the substantial number of unique cutaneous displays presented in the literature. In this work, we demonstrate how measuring the space of tactile sensa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinguishing feature of the W-FYD is that, since the fabric stretching is actuated separately from the lifting mechanism, the stiffness of the fabric can be changed independently and is decoupled from the force exerted on the user in the passive mode. This is an important difference respect to previously proposed designs, e.g., [13], [30], where the force increases as the sheet is wrapped around the finger, thus not allowing to independently control force and stiffness.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 76%
“…The distinguishing feature of the W-FYD is that, since the fabric stretching is actuated separately from the lifting mechanism, the stiffness of the fabric can be changed independently and is decoupled from the force exerted on the user in the passive mode. This is an important difference respect to previously proposed designs, e.g., [13], [30], where the force increases as the sheet is wrapped around the finger, thus not allowing to independently control force and stiffness.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Regarding characterization of the device, results showed nominal output force was 1 N, with a bandwidth of 30 Hz, which is acceptable for a fingertip haptic device. In comparison, haptic devices actuated by miniaturized RC servo motors [1,2,11] achieve maximum bandwidth below 10 Hz, with the additional drawback of haptic and acoustic noise generated by the gear reduction. On the other hand, voice coil actuated haptic devices achieve frequencies up to 250 Hz [5] at the cost of higher mass (30 g) or lower output force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the interact phase after contact, the stimulation frequency stayed the same, so as not to deliver further information and purely evaluate the efficacy of the proximity sensation at the initial contact. telerobotic object manipulation because it is the most basic mode of fine finger control [45][46][47][48] and has been widely used for telerobotic surgeries 49,50 . Also, tips of the robotic gripper move along one direction, making the data analysis and comparison simple and clear.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Proximity Sensationmentioning
confidence: 99%