2019 American Control Conference (ACC) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2019.8814677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Chance Constrained Optimization under Wasserstein Ambiguity Sets

Abstract: We present a data-driven approach for distributionally robust chance constrained optimization problems (DRCCPs). We consider the case where the decision maker has access to a finite number of samples or realizations of the uncertainty. The chance constraint is then required to hold for all distributions that are close to the empirical distribution constructed from the samples (where the distance between two distributions is defined via the Wasserstein metric). We first reformulate DRCCPs under data-driven Wass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, data-driven chance constraints over Wasserstein balls were exactly reformulated as mixed-integer conic constraints [145,146]. Leveraging the strong duality result [147], distributionally robust chance constrained programs with Wasserstein ambiguity set were studied for linear constraints with both right and left hand uncertainty [148], as well as for general nonlinear constraints [149].…”
Section: Data-driven Chance Constrained Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, data-driven chance constraints over Wasserstein balls were exactly reformulated as mixed-integer conic constraints [145,146]. Leveraging the strong duality result [147], distributionally robust chance constrained programs with Wasserstein ambiguity set were studied for linear constraints with both right and left hand uncertainty [148], as well as for general nonlinear constraints [149].…”
Section: Data-driven Chance Constrained Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the definition and property of CVaR, a sufficient condition for (17) can be expressed by [30]right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3pttruesup P scriptM i ε CVaR 1 α P L ( ξ normalΣ , P normalΣ normalr ) 0 where CVaR 1 α P )(L false( ξ Σ , P Σ r false) can be calculated by solving the following problem over γ [31]:right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3pttrueinf γ R α 1 double-struckE P ][L )(ξ Σ , P Σ r + γ + γ where false( false)+ = truemax falsefalse{ , 0 falsefalse}. With a collection of given samples, the expectation operator E P can be approximated.…”
Section: Solution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a collection of given samples, the expectation operator E P can be approximated. Further, employing Lemma V.8 in [30], a sufficient condition of CVaR constraint (18) is:right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptε H normalL + trueinf γ R 1 K k = 1 K ][L )(ξ ^ Σ k , P Σ normalr , k + γ + γ α 0 where H L is the measurement of Lipschitz continuity. In addition, we claim the loss function L )(ξ Σ , P Σ r satisfies the boundedness, convexity, and Lipschitz continuity assumptions required by Lemma V.8.…”
Section: Solution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As (16) is chance-constrained programming, it can be reformulated as the following CVaR constraint [26] to limit the frequency and severity of constraint violations…”
Section: ) Capacity Limitation Of Chargers Msbs and Transformersmentioning
confidence: 99%