2023
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2023.3283849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Bridge Weigh-in-Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MiniRocket achieves the best performance for both vehicle sets. For all vehicles, it achieves an R 2 of 0.94 and an MAE of 0.76 m/s, which is slightly better than the 0.86 m/s of Kawakatsu et al [23]. All featurebased methods have comparable results for R 2 and are less effective than MiniRocket.…”
Section: Speedmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MiniRocket achieves the best performance for both vehicle sets. For all vehicles, it achieves an R 2 of 0.94 and an MAE of 0.76 m/s, which is slightly better than the 0.86 m/s of Kawakatsu et al [23]. All featurebased methods have comparable results for R 2 and are less effective than MiniRocket.…”
Section: Speedmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…GB has the best R 2 for trucks and is slightly worse than MiniRocket in MSE and MAE. MiniRocket, with an MAE of 1.02 m/s is still only 0.16 m/s worse than Kawakatsu et al [23]. However, they evaluate more data, making their results more robust.…”
Section: Speedmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation