Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Data Management 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1071246.1071279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data dissemination in mobile peer-to-peer networks

Abstract: In this paper we propose adaptive content-driven routing and data dissemination algorithms for intelligently routing search queries in a peer-to-peer network that supports mobile users. In our mechanism nodes build content synopses of their data and adaptively disseminate them to the most appropriate nodes. Based on the content synopses, a routing mechanism is being built to forward the queries to those nodes that have a high probability of providing the desired results. Our simulation results show that our ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile Peer-to-Peer/MANET search can be roughly classified into: i) Blind Search [18,31,51], where mobile peers propagate the query using an unsophisticated (e.g., random, ttl property) approach to as many nodes in the network as possible, and ii) Informed Search [8,23,24,33,39,46], where mobile peers use semantic or location information to forward queries to specific nodes in the network. The proposed search approach presented in this paper belongs to the latter class with the difference that we utilize a centralized approach where mobile peers (i.e., smartphone devices) subscribe to a centralized registry.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mobile Peer-to-Peer/MANET search can be roughly classified into: i) Blind Search [18,31,51], where mobile peers propagate the query using an unsophisticated (e.g., random, ttl property) approach to as many nodes in the network as possible, and ii) Informed Search [8,23,24,33,39,46], where mobile peers use semantic or location information to forward queries to specific nodes in the network. The proposed search approach presented in this paper belongs to the latter class with the difference that we utilize a centralized approach where mobile peers (i.e., smartphone devices) subscribe to a centralized registry.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed search approach presented in this paper belongs to the latter class with the difference that we utilize a centralized approach where mobile peers (i.e., smartphone devices) subscribe to a centralized registry. Similar to [39], we utilize a content summary mechanism (i.e., profile) for discovering mobile peers that will participate in a query Q by the centralized node. However, in our setting, the content summary of each mobile peer is stored at the centralized node upon its registration thus allowing multiple query users to use this information without requiring the retransmission of the content summary to each mobile peer.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], [20], [21] and [22] the authors propose that each peer stores two types of filters, a local filter (LF) computed from attributes of local objects and remote filters (RF) for attributes of objects stored in remote peers. When a peer receives a query for a particular set of attributes in the form of a bit-vector, it searches its LF then the RF filters in order to decide whether the requested information is stored locally or the request should be further routed.…”
Section: A Bloom Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mobile p2p networks, communication overhead, a network centric metric has been well addressed [4]- [8]. However, we believe that search overhead at local nodes is also important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%