2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-012-9240-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data collection in global software engineering research: learning from past experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigating GSD work practices, we took seriously the many challenges that research in distributed software development poses [26], and we conducted extensive fieldwork at the two sites involved. We studied the IT division in a Danish financial enterprise that employs more than 20,000 people in northern Europe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating GSD work practices, we took seriously the many challenges that research in distributed software development poses [26], and we conducted extensive fieldwork at the two sites involved. We studied the IT division in a Danish financial enterprise that employs more than 20,000 people in northern Europe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the collaborative work practices I will conduct work place studies (Luff, Hindmarsh et al, 2000) and apply ethnographical approaches (Randall, Harper et al, 2010) when following one or more GSD projects from multiple locations (Prikladnicki, Boden et al, 2013). Various ethnographic data gathering techniques will be applied e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…making decisions regarding requirements are fruitless [28,33], Iss13: Asynchronous correspondence leads to deferment in proliferation and resolution of issues [102], Iss14: If there are synchronous meetings amid the locations which have substantial differences regarding time then participants belonging to some locations are bothered as there are huge differences between the meeting times and their local working times [40,[102][103], Iss15: Shareholders are not able to express in the correspondence language [33], Iss16: Electronic correspondence alike email permits clandestine correspondence that generates complications for settling clashes regarding requirements [33], Iss17: Shareholders don't convey to one another adequately, instead seek to apply force and utilize influence on one another [102], Iss18: To illuminate and resolve the issues, any coworker may correspond with any shareholder that may cause tedious debates and additional controlling endeavors [104], Iss19: Correspondence gaps or postponements amid RE because of individuality conflicts [105], Iss20: Online correspondence to elucidate requirements prompts spiny requirements because resulting requirements are uncertain, alter again and again or are unfinished [106], Iss21: To arrange interviews, acquiring the assent of far off shareholders [107], Iss22: Typically, there is non-recording of the promises that are done amid videoconferencing or discussions on the telephone, consequently such pledges cannot be alluded when needed [Proposed].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…requirements as fast as needed [112,116], Iss37: Functioning on the outdated requirements [111,117], Iss38: Hitches in accessibility of the steady data because of the dissemination of sources [118], Iss39: Scarcity of the mindfulness regarding deployment environment may cause ambiguity in requirements [94], Iss40: Unfamiliarity to the background and significance of requirements can cause project postponements and quality tradeoffs [119], Iss41: Requirements illuminations are passed on later than expected time which can cause project postponements [111], Iss42: Incapability to share information or finest practices [28,120] iii. Cultural diversities' issues, Iss47: Detachment leads to cultural variances amongst the different working departments belonging to an organization which produces difficulty in achieving the shared awareness about the requirements [33,102], Iss48: Generating trust amongst the different shareholders is demanding [33,107,[122][123][124][125], Iss49: Upholding trust amongst the different shareholders is demanding [123,125], Iss50: Scarcity of trust amongst the different shareholders [17,93,107,[122][123]126], Iss51: Evasion of the obligations from the different shareholders [94], Iss52: Forfeiture of attachment amongst the shareholders on account of physical dispersal [127], Iss53: Complications in attaining consent on requirements [30,40,94,128], Iss54: Shareholders originate from miscellaneous social backgrounds and own dissimilar moral standards regarding hierarchies, addressing risks, tracking timetables and promptness that can intensify disagreements [94], Iss55: Various cul...…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%