2006
DOI: 10.3182/20060402-4-br-2902.00091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Based Uncertainty Modeling by Convex Optimization Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…will be violated with the already determined  , or satisfied only loosely, at a number of frequencies. It is straightforward to determine a new  at every considered frequency to tightly satisfy (16) with the model () Gs . However, a better approach to do a partial re-optimization by using parameters of ( j ) G  that appear linearly in the constraint corresponding to (14), i.e.,…”
Section: Finding a Nominal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…will be violated with the already determined  , or satisfied only loosely, at a number of frequencies. It is straightforward to determine a new  at every considered frequency to tightly satisfy (16) with the model () Gs . However, a better approach to do a partial re-optimization by using parameters of ( j ) G  that appear linearly in the constraint corresponding to (14), i.e.,…”
Section: Finding a Nominal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard type of uncertainty model is one where the uncertainty description is in the form of a linear fractional transformation (LFT) [14]. The size of the uncertainty required to cover a given set of models depends not only on the set of models, but also on the nominal model [15,16]. In this paper, a method is proposed for finding the nominal model of an LFT uncertainty model that minimizes the -gap metric with respect to a set of known models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nominal model is typically computed by simply averaging the frequency response data. Approaches to construct uncertainty models from time domain data have also been presented in [6]- [9]. This paper uses convex optimization to construct uncertainty sets from experimental frequency response data.…”
Section: Department Of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [2], it is essential that the identification methods deliver optimal uncertainty sets, including a nominal model, rather than an uncertainty bound around a prefixed nominal model. Thus, the uncertainty set should be minimized over both the nominal model and the uncertainty bound, as done, e.g., in [3]. For an LFT type of uncertainty, it has recently been shown that the ∞  norm of the uncertainty is a rigorous measure of the worst-case degradation of the stability margin for a system under feedback control irrespective of the particular type of uncertainty structure [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%