2015
DOI: 10.1051/cocv/2014042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data assimilation of time under-sampled measurements using observers, the wave-like equation example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now end this section by finally justifying (18). Indeed, by differentiating (16) 1 around x =x − n+1 and y =x…”
Section: Proposition 10mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We now end this section by finally justifying (18). Indeed, by differentiating (16) 1 around x =x − n+1 and y =x…”
Section: Proposition 10mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Mirroring the continuous setting, H n is a C 1 (R N obs )-mapping and dH n is bounded uniformly with respect to n. Note that, in general, measurement procedures are in essence time-sampled and the observation discrete-time model should be more directly defined than the observation continuous-time model. Then the latter can be regenerated by interpolation from the sampled measurements with a measurement error ω incorporating some interpolation error [18]. Eventually, we can consider the two frameworks independently or assuming that for all t ∈ [t n , t n+1 ], we have H(x, t) − H n (x) = O(∆t)).…”
Section: Models Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case of the discrete-time Kalman Filter considered as a discretization of the continuous-time Kalman Filter [61]. This was also proposed for Luenberger observers in [23]. Moreover, we emphasize that in our case a major advantage lies in the fact that the splitting step is explicit as is already the case for the non-linear reaction term.…”
Section: Numerical Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…and we can see that the observer correction term in (12) is nothing but −λ∇Jû with our particular choice of α function given in (23), namely, this is a gradient descent term quite similar to gradient projection methods in image processing [90].…”
Section: Proposition 3 Assuming That We Havementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation