2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.28.454017
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data and model considerations for estimating time-varying functional connectivity in fMRI

Abstract: Functional connectivity (FC) in the brain has been shown to exhibit subtle but reliable modulations within a session. One way of estimating time-varying FC is by using state-based models that describe fMRI time series as temporal sequences of states, each with an associated, characteristic pattern of FC. However, the estimation of these models from data sometimes fails to capture changes in a meaningful way, such that the model estimation assigns entire sessions (or the largest part of them) to a single state,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this parcellation was shown to maximize the cross modularity index between the functional and structural data, future work may also consider other brain parcellations to elucidate the robustness of our results by studying if age related changes in SC can also explain the differences high-order functional interactions in whole brain models. Analogously, some variations in the MRI preprocessing pipeline could also affects our results [ 67 ], as previous works have shown that affect pairwise FC studies [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While this parcellation was shown to maximize the cross modularity index between the functional and structural data, future work may also consider other brain parcellations to elucidate the robustness of our results by studying if age related changes in SC can also explain the differences high-order functional interactions in whole brain models. Analogously, some variations in the MRI preprocessing pipeline could also affects our results [ 67 ], as previous works have shown that affect pairwise FC studies [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a data reduction step for the fMRI HMM analysis (Ahrends et al, 2022;Vidaurre, Abeysuriya, et al, 2018;Vidaurre et al, 2017), HMM training. Only ICs that had time courses in the lower frequencies and did not spatially overlap with known artefacts (motion, vascular, physiological, susceptibility) or non-grey matter regions (white matter, CSF) were used in the subsequent analysis, resulting in 13 components being retained (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Fmri Spatial Icamentioning
confidence: 99%