Data Analysis of the Effect of Different Nanomaterials on Antislide Pile Performance in Railway Landslides

Abstract

Engineering geological conditions in our country are complex and diverse. Many high-rise buildings, bridges, and launch towers are inevitably built on high and steep slopes. Heavy rain, earthquake, human engineering activities, and other factors lead to frequent landslides, soil creep deformation, and overall sliding, resulting in a certain bending moment and flexural deformation of foundation piles, may cause damage to the substructure and foundation pile failure, and then endanger the safety of the superstructure. In the past, bridge pile group foundation was used in bridge pile foundation engineering to improve the impact situation, but the stress environment of bridge pile foundation in landslide is obviously different from that of bridge pile foundation in the flat area. The large deformation of soil in front of the pile will easily cause the phenomenon of soil sliding and peeling, which will increase the technical difficulty of antislide pile construction. Based on this, this study firstly briefly introduces the relevant theories and technologies of railway landslide antislide pile technology and then establishes the static model of railway landslide antislide piles with different nanomaterials. Finally, the reinforcement technology of different nanomaterial antislide piles for railway landslide is expounded, which can provide guarantee for the application of different nanomaterial antislide piles for railway landslide. The results show that the preloading is carried out according to 1/10 of the design load to reduce the void between the soils. After the load is maintained for 2 hours, the load is unloaded to 0, and good skid resistance can be obtained.

Retracted: Data Analysis of the Effect of Different Nanomaterials on Antislide Pile Performance in Railway Landslides

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”