2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2021.106839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data analysis methods for prospectivity modelling as applied to mineral exploration targeting: State-of-the-art and outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current literature may represent a bias toward topics which are the most obvious applications for spatial methods such as PGIS, LULC analysis and georeferencing non-spatial social survey data. Future research should focus on integrating spatial-integrated social analysis across the entire mining lifecycle, particularly in stages that have received less attention in the existing literature, notably Exploration Information System (EIS) (Kreuzer et al, 2020; Yousefi et al, 2019; 2021) and mine closure (McKenna et al, 2020; Rich et al, 2015). Other understudied areas include a broader spectrum of resources beyond coal, mapping intangible dimensions of mining such as ‘Culture’, ‘Community’ and ‘People’ indicators, and incorporating different scales of analysis, ranging from specific mining sites to broader contexts such as country-level and global assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current literature may represent a bias toward topics which are the most obvious applications for spatial methods such as PGIS, LULC analysis and georeferencing non-spatial social survey data. Future research should focus on integrating spatial-integrated social analysis across the entire mining lifecycle, particularly in stages that have received less attention in the existing literature, notably Exploration Information System (EIS) (Kreuzer et al, 2020; Yousefi et al, 2019; 2021) and mine closure (McKenna et al, 2020; Rich et al, 2015). Other understudied areas include a broader spectrum of resources beyond coal, mapping intangible dimensions of mining such as ‘Culture’, ‘Community’ and ‘People’ indicators, and incorporating different scales of analysis, ranging from specific mining sites to broader contexts such as country-level and global assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geospatial analysis through sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, particularly those utilizing deep learning and machine learning, have the potential to advance and make substantial contributions to mapping mining landscapes (Camalan et al, 2022; Q. Li et al, 2020; Nava et al, 2022) and for mineral exploration (Kreuzer et al, 2020; Yousefi et al, 2019; 2021). This technological development could potentially result in breakthroughs in our understanding of the magnitude and nature of mining impacts globally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yousefi et al (2019) and ( 2021) outline a pyramid model concept of an Exploration Information System procedure to overcome some of these challenges by reevaluating the approach to the data-knowledge-information-insight progression. The model consists of defining knowledge relationships for particular mineral deposit types in a mineral systems model, leveraging the relationships to extract key data features representing proxies of the targeted mineral system and integrating these spatial data proxies in a prospectivity analysis for exploration target modeling (Yousefi et al, 2019(Yousefi et al, , 2021.…”
Section: Geologic Resource Assessment Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The industry can benefit from access to previously unavailable information through the B2B data trade. This would allow partners to exploit the collective data volume though machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), ,, and digital laboratories with augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR), , and can inform mineral systems analysis and exploration, , process innovation, and supply chain management . Similarly, transdisciplinary stakeholder collaborations can contribute to joint problem solving. Policy Trends and Best Practice Examples .…”
Section: Framework For Systems Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%