2009
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DASMI: exchanging, annotating and assessing molecular interaction data

Abstract: Motivation: Ever increasing amounts of biological interaction data are being accumulated worldwide, but they are currently not readily accessible to the biologist at a single site. New techniques are required for retrieving, sharing and presenting data spread over the Internet.Results: We introduce the DASMI system for the dynamic exchange, annotation and assessment of molecular interaction data. DASMI is based on the widely used Distributed Annotation System (DAS) and consists of a data exchange specification… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 Furthermore, databases that mainly contain in silico predicted complexes will contain more false positives than manually curated ones, but many of the larger databases allow the selection of subsets that are more suited for the evaluated technologies or have a specific throughput. Several databases also exist that aggregate and consolidate data from all the other databases, [282][283][284][285][286] facilitated by the wide adoption of unified formatting standards. 287,288 Although these aggregated databases give a more complete view of all possible interactions, they still have clear biases.…”
Section: Replication Combination and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Furthermore, databases that mainly contain in silico predicted complexes will contain more false positives than manually curated ones, but many of the larger databases allow the selection of subsets that are more suited for the evaluated technologies or have a specific throughput. Several databases also exist that aggregate and consolidate data from all the other databases, [282][283][284][285][286] facilitated by the wide adoption of unified formatting standards. 287,288 Although these aggregated databases give a more complete view of all possible interactions, they still have clear biases.…”
Section: Replication Combination and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, researchers require a system to retrieve confidence scores for user-defined sets of molecular interactions. This led to the development of the PSI confidence scoring system (PSISCORE) based on an earlier study 4 (Supplementary Note 2). …”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteomic data has been used in the development of various software utilities used in the analyses of genomic and proteomic data. PPI data from HPRD has been used in several interactomebased biological network visualization tools such as DASMIweb [51,52], DynaMod [53], PATIKAweb [54], POINeT [55], SubExtractor [56], NASCENT [57], ConsensusPathDB [58], VisANT [59], Genes2Networks [60], Cerebral [61,62], BioNetBuilder [62], COXPRESdb [63], STRING 8 [64], and UniHI [65]. Proteomic information from HPRD has been utilized in the functional analysis of an integrin adhesome network [66].…”
Section: Human Protein Reference Database As a Platform For Systems Bmentioning
confidence: 99%