2019
DOI: 10.1055/a-0918-9473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Das neue ISUP 2014/WHO 2016 Prostatakarzinom-Grading – Status quo 5 Jahre nach seiner Einführung

Abstract: Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Im Jahr 2014 wurde durch die ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) eine Modifikation des Gradings für das Prostatakarzinom (PCa) eingeführt, welches 2016 von der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) anerkannt und übernommen wurde. Neben der Definition von 5 „Grade Groups“ wurden auch einige histomorphologische Kriterien angepasst. Unsere Übersichtsarbeit stellt die Ergebnisse aller aktuellen Studien und deren Bewertungen des neuen Gradings zusammen. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to treatment, individual PCa stages are defined, with prostatic adenocarcinomas being the predominant variant [3]. To precisely assess cancer aggressiveness and thus determine appropriate therapy options, the Gleason score or the resulting WHO grading systems are recommended [11,12]. Both systems are based on the evaluation of histological tumor structures, differentiation stages, and gland cell morphologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to treatment, individual PCa stages are defined, with prostatic adenocarcinomas being the predominant variant [3]. To precisely assess cancer aggressiveness and thus determine appropriate therapy options, the Gleason score or the resulting WHO grading systems are recommended [11,12]. Both systems are based on the evaluation of histological tumor structures, differentiation stages, and gland cell morphologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%