Das Gruppendiskussionsverfahren

Loos, Peter; Schäffer, Burkhard

doi:10.1007/978-3-322-93352-2

Cited by 359 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is a standard problem within social environmentalists' studies of, e.g., fringe groups, youth groups, and people who define their in-groups through disassociation of others. A method for the purpose of witnessing moments of interactive generation of collective orientations was developed by social environmentalists Bohnsack (1989) and Loos and Schäffer (2001), and adapted and modified for the purpose of the study this paper is reporting on. 1 Although a literal translation of the method's German name 'Gruppendiskussion' would be 'group discussion,' it is better introduced as 'phenomenological group interview' (PGI) thus corresponding closer to classifications made in Denzin and Lincoln's (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The key assumption behind them is that the members of the respective groups share a more or less common experience of enculturation into these groups. Such a body of experience has been called "biographically collective" (Loos and Schäffer 2001), not in the sense of actually having experienced something together, at the same time and place, but of a structurally identical experience.…”

Section: Collective Orientation As Socially-agreed-upon Knowledge Basementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Routines and collective orientations in mathematics teachers’ professional development

Gellert

2007

Educ Stud Math

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is an increasing awareness of the social dimension in mathematics teacher education. Collaboration and co-operation are regarded as key factors in professional development. In this paper I will analyse some tensions that might arise when the professional development of mathematics teachers is considered a collective enterprise. I will present phenomenological group interview as a method that is designed to reveal the collective character of teacher development. Some primary teachers' collective reflections on an ongoing professional development process will be interpreted by focusing on the concepts of routine and collective orientation. The discussion is centred on the ambivalence of routines, as facilitators of practice, and collective orientations, as socially-agreed-upon knowledge base, for mathematics teachers' professional development.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Collective Orientation As Socially-agreed-upon Knowledge Basementioning

confidence: 99%

Routines and collective orientations in mathematics teachers’ professional development

Gellert

2007

Educ Stud Math

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…B. [6][7][8][9][10][11]) ersetzen. Die folgenden Abschnitte zeigen Fragen auf, die sich Forscher_innen im Verlauf des Forschungsprozesses stellen sollten.…”

Section: Zum Verständnis Des Artikelsunclassified

“…Historisch gesehen hat sich also die Ausgestaltung und Anwendung von Fokusgruppen und Gruppendiskussionen getrennt von-und doch gewissermaßen parallel zueinander entwickelt. Grundsätzlich haben beide Verfahren gemeinsam, dass es sich um moderierte Gespräche über (vorgegebene) Themen in einer Gruppe, also eine gruppenförmige kommunikative Interaktion [10] handelt. Deren inhaltliche (Worüber wird geredet?)…”

Section: Unterschiedliche Strukturierungsgrade Von Gruppenverfahrenunclassified

Gruppendiskussionen in der Versorgungsforschung – Teil 1: Einführung und Überlegungen zur Methodenwahl und Planung

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health services researchers focus on the players, structures and impact of health care in "real life". They investigate how social aspects, financing, organizational structures, technologies and personal attitudes affect the process and outcomes of health care. Qualitative research methods are used here, which address how people act according to their unique living conditions (outside the context of experimental studies). Different methods of debriefing groups are essential for qualitative health services research. In 2 subsequent articles, we aim to outline the diverse facets and possible range of implementation of the above-mentioned methods, in order to highlight the potential of debriefing groups in health services research (focus groups or group discussions) using these methods. In the current article, we would like to encourage researchers to reflect on relevant topics such as the selection of an appropriate method, the planning and undertaking of investigations including sampling methods, and questions regarding ethics and privacy. A follow-up article (in preparation) will deal with theoretical considerations of the term "group", as well as with the process of moderating discussions, methods of analyzing data and (qualitative) online research.

show abstract

“…Die inhaltliche Zusammensetzung der Gruppen erfolgte anhand der Filmkommunikate, wobei auf die Heterogenität der Gruppen geachtet wurde, um durch die Gruppendiskussion die Differenz von persönlichen Filmkommunikaten und der "Gruppenmeinung" rekonstruieren zu können (vgl. BOHNSACK 2000;LOOS/SCHÄFFER 2001;DRINCK u.a. 2001).…”

Section: Untersuchungsdesign Und Datenerhebungunclassified