Arbeit, Arbeitsmarkt Und Betriebe 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-91437-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Das Beschäftigungssystem der DDR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobility of labor between occupations and firms was not desired since it interfered with central planning and increased costs, and low labor mobility led to low residential mobility. Second, a dramatic shortage of housing depressed residential mobility further (Grünert 1996;Grünert, Bernien, and Lutz 1997;Grundmann 1998;Wolle 1998: 182-88;Uunk, Mach, and Mayer 2005). We therefore think it highly unlikely that the ignorability assumption is violated by spatial sorting.…”
Section: Threats To the Ignorability Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mobility of labor between occupations and firms was not desired since it interfered with central planning and increased costs, and low labor mobility led to low residential mobility. Second, a dramatic shortage of housing depressed residential mobility further (Grünert 1996;Grünert, Bernien, and Lutz 1997;Grundmann 1998;Wolle 1998: 182-88;Uunk, Mach, and Mayer 2005). We therefore think it highly unlikely that the ignorability assumption is violated by spatial sorting.…”
Section: Threats To the Ignorability Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also, workers were reluctant to leave firms as these had an important social function. Therefore, changes of the sectoral structure, which would have improved the competitiveness of the East German economy, did not take place (Grünert, 1996;Ritter, 2007). Finally, the rather small finance and insurance sector grew strongly, and the construction sector experienced a boom which lasted until 1996 when employment started to decrease again.…”
Section: Employment Development By Economic Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a centrally planned economy such as the GDR, spatial mobility was seriously hampered; the allocation of labor as a factor of production had to follow the overarching social and economic objectives set by the planning committees. Mobility of labor across occupations and across space was therefore considerably lower than in any free-market economy, and was additionally reduced by the serious housing shortages that affected the GDR over the whole 40 years of its existence (Kern and Hainmueller, 2009, p. 387;Grünert, 1996).…”
Section: Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%