Das ältere Fuþark – Überlieferung und Wirkungsmöglichkeiten der Runenreihe

Düwel, Klaus; Heizmann, Wilhelm

doi:10.1515/9783110922981.3

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…также Dietz et al 1996 По-видимому, руны в значении своих названий употреблены на черепках из археологических раскопках в Лепесовке, где предполагают готское поселение III в. На одном из них надпись lWl (lwl), на другом одна единственная руна m (R) (Tikhanova 1977). Руна m значила 'лось' или 'защита' и была одним из важных защитных символов (Düwel 2008)). В том случае, если руны употреблены в значении символов, мы получаем l 'жидкость', W 'радость' и снова W 'жидкость'.…”

Section: корректные лексемыunclassified

“…Не включил он обе эти надписи и в свой свод старшерунических надписей 1966 года (Krause, Jahnkun 1966). И все более поздние рунологи следовали за Краузе (Düwel 2008). Однако если такое определение может подходить для надписи из Нездровиц, то в надписи из Дзедзиц (см.…”

Section: корректные лексемыunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Untitled

2022

IELCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: корректные лексемыunclassified

Untitled

2022

IELCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…and 246-7) and cf. Du¨wel & Heizmann (2006) and Sundqvist (2009). The Vadstena bracteate's futhark row, for example, is only accompanied by the repeated charm word tuwa 'dedication, offering' (cf.…”

Section: Runes As Dedicatorymentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Giving’ and ‘Making’ in Early Runic Epigraphy

Mees

2012

Trans of the Philol Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A survey of the early Germanic etymological semantics of ‘giving’ and ‘making’ is presented in light of the recent reaffirmation that early Nordic *taujan is etymologically related to Old Norse tœja ‘grant, bestow, help, assist’. Contextualising the early runic fabricatory and dedicatory inscriptions in terms of sociological, textual and anthropological theory, a new interpretation of early runic pragmatics is developed. The new approach to early runic performance proferred seeks to explain the broader function (and context) of epigraphic production, not merely the most logical reading of individual texts. The early runic pragmatics of ‘giving’ and ‘making’ are employed as an analytical frame in which to analyse the socio‐cultural as well as linguistic meaning of a series of both functionally and textually related, often significantly stylised Iron Age epigraphs found on a range of early Scandinavian media: runestones, moor finds and migration‐era amulets.

show abstract

Raetic and Runes

Salomon

2020

NOWELE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper investigates the potential role of the Raetic inscription corpus for the derivation of the Germanic futhark. It gives an overview of the North Italic corpora and the current state of research, focussing on the Raetic epigraphical evidence. A detailed comparison of the grapheme inventories of Raetic and Runic as well as their respective epigraphical characteristics shows that the Raetic alphabets do not serve as convincing models for the Runic script.

show abstract

Das ältere Fuþark – Überlieferung und Wirkungsmöglichkeiten der Runenreihe

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Untitled

Untitled

‘Giving’ and ‘Making’ in Early Runic Epigraphy

Raetic and Runes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About