1975
DOI: 10.1038/253603a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Darwinian evolution in the genealogy of haemoglobin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
142
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
142
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Goodman et al (6), observing the homology between the ␣ and ␤ chains of hemoglobin, hypothesized that the ancestral hemoglobin molecule, before the gene duplication that gave rise to separate ␣ and ␤ chain genes, was a homotetramer. Jensen (7), observing the ''substrate ambiguity'' of many contemporary enzymes, proposed that after duplication of an ancestral gene encoding an enzyme of broad specificity, the daughter genes may divide the work of the ancestor, encoding enzymes of narrower specificity.…”
Section: New Proteins For Old Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goodman et al (6), observing the homology between the ␣ and ␤ chains of hemoglobin, hypothesized that the ancestral hemoglobin molecule, before the gene duplication that gave rise to separate ␣ and ␤ chain genes, was a homotetramer. Jensen (7), observing the ''substrate ambiguity'' of many contemporary enzymes, proposed that after duplication of an ancestral gene encoding an enzyme of broad specificity, the daughter genes may divide the work of the ancestor, encoding enzymes of narrower specificity.…”
Section: New Proteins For Old Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For residue positions with defined functional roles in mammalian a-and /3-chains of haemoglobin in connection with the Bohr effect, binding of polyphosphates such as 2,3-diphosphoglycerate, or salt links between the chains in tetramers (Goodman et al 1975), there are no identical positions when compared with human haemoglobin chains. This is in keeping with the absence ofheterotropic interactions in the dimeric haemoglobin (Furuta et al 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant amino acid differences in echidna and platypus haemoglobins Sequence data are from Whittaker et al (1972Whittaker et al ( , 1973, and Whittaker and Thompson (1974). The functional significance is from Goodman et al (1975) to have sufficiently similar stereochemical properties that they are unlikely to have a significant effect. In the oc-chains the substitutions CD4 Met --+ Phe and EI0 Arg --+ Lys are involved in important haem contacts (Perutz 1976), and although the residues have similar chemical properties th~.ir steric differences, although minor, could well modify the relation between the haem and the CD and E helices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amino acid sequence studies show 16 amino acid differences between the ~-chain of echidna Hb-IB and platypus haemoglobin and 14 amino acid differences between the ,8~chains. Goodman et al (1975) have listed amino acid residues with defined functional roles in mammalian haemoglobin oc-and ,8-chains. It might be expected that the marked differences in oxygen binding properties between echidna and platypus haemoglobins are due to amino acid substitutions at sites having known functional roles, However, the important OC1,82 contact sites, DPG binding sites, and residues involved in the Bohr effect are identical in platypus and echidna haemoglobin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%