2017
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2017.2685528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DART: Recent Advances in Remote Sensing Data Modeling With Atmosphere, Polarization, and Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This index is not particularly suited for fragmented agricultural landscapes with different crops within the same pixel or for complex mixed forests, and therefore additional studies are needed to define strategies for global scale applications. Moreover, further studies exploiting new emerging 3‐D radiative transfer models incorporating fluorescence, like FluorWPS (Zhao et al., ), FluorFLIGHT (Hernández‐Clemente et al., ) and DART (Gastellu‐Etchegorry et al., ) will help to test the performance of CCFI and the effects caused by the canopy structure on the fluorescence signal recorded from mixed pixels. In summary, the CCFI index can be applied, under certain conditions, to coarse spatial resolution data to minimize confounding factors due to the spatial variability of canopy structure, and it is expected to be suitable for applications assessing vegetation function in future Earth Observations in the fluorescence era.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This index is not particularly suited for fragmented agricultural landscapes with different crops within the same pixel or for complex mixed forests, and therefore additional studies are needed to define strategies for global scale applications. Moreover, further studies exploiting new emerging 3‐D radiative transfer models incorporating fluorescence, like FluorWPS (Zhao et al., ), FluorFLIGHT (Hernández‐Clemente et al., ) and DART (Gastellu‐Etchegorry et al., ) will help to test the performance of CCFI and the effects caused by the canopy structure on the fluorescence signal recorded from mixed pixels. In summary, the CCFI index can be applied, under certain conditions, to coarse spatial resolution data to minimize confounding factors due to the spatial variability of canopy structure, and it is expected to be suitable for applications assessing vegetation function in future Earth Observations in the fluorescence era.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, our results indicate that leaf level correlations observed over diurnal time scales may not be present in seasonal trends, where longer term changes in plant pigments, temperature and irradiance become influential. However, the extent to which the observed leaf level correlations can be scaled to the top of canopy (TOC) using, for instance, a combination of an airborne variant of LIFT [49,50] and canopy radiative transfer modelling [51,52], requires further investigation. At TOC we would expect lower SIF red due to reabsorption by canopy elements containing PAR absorbing pigments [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic principle is that SIF-photosynthesis mechanisms are first calculated at the leaf scale and then propagated throughout the canopy. Based on this principle, similar SIF leaf-to-canopy mechanisms have been recently introduced into even more advanced RTMs that explicitly account for canopy structure, such as DART [18] and FLIGHT [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%