2013
DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.1077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dårlig tittel – dårlig manus?

Abstract: In this study, a poor manuscript title was significantly associated with manuscript rejection. This indicates that the quality of the title often reflects the quality of the manuscript itself.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the keyword "fluoride varnish" was used in a third of the selected papers, even though it was addressed in all papers. Since keywords are a search strategy to find papers, it is interesting to notice that other parts of the studies need to be well-detailed [Gjersvik et al, 2013].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the keyword "fluoride varnish" was used in a third of the selected papers, even though it was addressed in all papers. Since keywords are a search strategy to find papers, it is interesting to notice that other parts of the studies need to be well-detailed [Gjersvik et al, 2013].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is mixed evidence on whether attempts at poetic titles tend to be successful. Medical papers with clichés in their title seem more likely to be rejected (Gjersvik, Gulbrandsen, et al, 2013). In psychology, articles with titles rated amusing by human judges tend to be more cited (Subotic & Mukherjee, 2014).…”
Section: Article Titlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, contradictory literature exists regarding the optimum length of the title, the influence of the title on the citation rates, editorial review, readership, impact, and the perceived quality of the manuscript. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Keeping these aside, several general guidelines may help the prospective authors construct a good title.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%