Dark times for cosmopolitanism? An ethical framework to address private agri‐food governance and planetary stewardship

Abstract

The scholarly tradition of cosmopolitanism (illustrated by the old saying, “I am a citizen of the world”) offers important insights into the examination of agri‐food multinational corporations (MNCs) as powerful global actors. Acknowledging that agriculture is the business sector with the highest planetary environmental impact, in this paper, we advance existing discussions around cosmopolitanism and the normative implications of considering agri‐food MNCs as political actors. Relying on an integrative literature review, we propose a tripartite ethical framework that gives a new momentum to the ideals and tenets of cosmopolitanism. This novel lens offers an integrated, seamless ethical approach and revolves around three dimensions: culture, morality, and governance. The first dimension examines key agri‐food cultural and social‐ecological issues, the second acknowledges interdependence and causality as central to understanding MNCs’ ethical responsibilities, and the third outlines several governance parameters around legitimacy, planetary reach and efficiency. Hence, our integrative framework resituates the planetary geographical imagination of cosmopolitanism within the biophysical parameters outlined by the planetary boundaries concept, advancing key issues on private agri‐food environmental governance and planetary stewardship.

Reimagining Business Ethics as Ethos-Driven Practice: A Deweyan Perspective

“…While one might expect ethos-as-habitat to feature in business ethics literature on topics like environmental ethics, few works discuss it explicitly. Most articles only contribute to this conversation inadvertently (e.g., Allen et al, 2019; Alcaraz et al, 2021). A rare exception is Alistair Wardrope’s piece on ‘Medical Ethics and the Land Ethic’ (2023) which builds on Aldo Leopold’s (2014) ecology-based ethical extension towards a ‘land ethic’.…”

Deliver Smart, Not More! Building Economically Sustainable Competitiveness on the Ground of High Agri-Food Trade Specialization in the EU

“…These practices are considered to meet current and future nutritional societal needs and that maximize societal net benefits, while having all costs and benefits of the practices taken into account [50]. Moreover, since the socioeconomic and environmental interconnections of the agricultural sector with other sectors (energy, manufacturing, transportation) were acknowledged [51][52][53], it is the role of politics and ethics to find pathways for the harmonization of societal and economical needs with the expected environmental impacts of the agricultural practices [54,55].…”